Germany: Staying the Course

Compared with many other countries, Germany makes relatively little use of imprisonment, including for offenses of middle seriousness. In 2023 only 5 percent of all convicted offenders received an unconditional prison sentence. Another 10 percent received suspended prison sentences. All others had only to pay fines. This pattern has been stable for 50 years and has been accompanied in recent decades by a decreasing incidence of crime reported to the police. Scholarly attention has focused on a lack of consistency in sentencing; there are remarkable differences in average sentence lengths among local courts. The parliament, however, has chosen neither to establish a sentencing data bank nor to promulgate or move toward creation of a system of sentencing guidelines. Despite occasional media grumbling, the population at large does not seem to see a great need for a significant increase in sentencing severity. The German parliament and judiciary have by and large refrained from moving toward a more severe approach, except for some changes in authorized sentencing ranges for terrorism and sexual offenses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Crime and Justice
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740090
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germany: Staying the Course

Thomas Weigend
Crime and Justice
Criminal Law and Policy
article

Germany: Staying the Course

Thomas Weigend
article en

Abstract

Compared with many other countries, Germany makes relatively little use of imprisonment, including for offenses of middle seriousness. In 2023 only 5 percent of all convicted offenders received an unconditional prison sentence. Another 10 percent received suspended prison sentences. All others had only to pay fines. This pattern has been stable for 50 years and has been accompanied in recent decades by a decreasing incidence of crime reported to the police. Scholarly attention has focused on a lack of consistency in sentencing; there are remarkable differences in average sentence lengths among local courts. The parliament, however, has chosen neither to establish a sentencing data bank nor to promulgate or move toward creation of a system of sentencing guidelines. Despite occasional media grumbling, the population at large does not seem to see a great need for a significant increase in sentencing severity. The German parliament and judiciary have by and large refrained from moving toward a more severe approach, except for some changes in authorized sentencing ranges for terrorism and sexual offenses.

Crime and Justice
Gender equality, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Germany: Staying the Course — Thomas Weigend · Crime and Justice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS