Challenges and expectations on the use of automated home cage monitoring for advancing laboratory animal care and welfare

COST Action TEATIME unites experts to advance automated monitoring technologies for laboratory animals, with a focus on Home Cage Monitoring (HCM) systems. The use of HCM has great potential to revolutionise welfare monitoring by enabling continuous, non-invasive tracking of physiological and behavioural patterns in group-housed animals within their undisturbed housing environment. These systems capture spontaneous behaviours - such as feeding, grooming, social interactions and sleep cycles - across day and night phases, offering objective data for welfare and scientific assessments. This real-time monitoring might allow for early detection of distress, disease progression and subtle welfare changes, supporting timely interventions and refined humane endpoints. Unlike traditional clinical scoring, which relies on brief daily observations, HCM provides longitudinal, individualised insights and reduces observer bias. It might also facilitate better characterisation of positive affective states, contributing to more holistic welfare evaluations. Despite technological progress, challenges remain in data integration, sensitivity and standardisation across facilities. Effective implementation requires real-time alert capabilities, robust data management, and interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists, veterinarians and data experts. HCM systems should complement - not replace - human expertise, enriching welfare monitoring and scientific reproducibility. Their integration can improve husbandry, refine severity assessments, advancing both animal welfare and scientific replicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Animals
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251396319
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and expectations on the use of automated home cage monitoring for advancing laboratory animal care and welfare

Petra Seebeck, Vootele Võikar, Tremoleda Jordi L., Heidrun Potschka et al.
Laboratory Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Challenges and expectations on the use of automated home cage monitoring for advancing laboratory animal care and welfare

Petra Seebeck, Vootele Võikar, Tremoleda Jordi L., Heidrun Potschka, Sara Wells, Oliver Stiedl, Aurora Brønstad, TEATIME Animal Welfare Subgroup
article en

Abstract

COST Action TEATIME unites experts to advance automated monitoring technologies for laboratory animals, with a focus on Home Cage Monitoring (HCM) systems. The use of HCM has great potential to revolutionise welfare monitoring by enabling continuous, non-invasive tracking of physiological and behavioural patterns in group-housed animals within their undisturbed housing environment. These systems capture spontaneous behaviours - such as feeding, grooming, social interactions and sleep cycles - across day and night phases, offering objective data for welfare and scientific assessments. This real-time monitoring might allow for early detection of distress, disease progression and subtle welfare changes, supporting timely interventions and refined humane endpoints. Unlike traditional clinical scoring, which relies on brief daily observations, HCM provides longitudinal, individualised insights and reduces observer bias. It might also facilitate better characterisation of positive affective states, contributing to more holistic welfare evaluations. Despite technological progress, challenges remain in data integration, sensitivity and standardisation across facilities. Effective implementation requires real-time alert capabilities, robust data management, and interdisciplinary collaboration among scientists, veterinarians and data experts. HCM systems should complement - not replace - human expertise, enriching welfare monitoring and scientific reproducibility. Their integration can improve husbandry, refine severity assessments, advancing both animal welfare and scientific replicability.

Laboratory Animals
University of Helsinki (FI), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Zurich (CH), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell (GB), Swiss Integrative Center for Human Health (CH), University of Bergen (NO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.