A Translator at Work: Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles’s Translation Notes on Alexander’s De Anima

<ns3:p> Background Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles’s mid-fourteenth-century Hebrew translation of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s <ns3:italic>De anima</ns3:italic> , made from Isḥaq ibn Ḥunayn’s ninth-century Arabic translation of the original Greek, survives in four manuscripts. Three of these contain Samuel’s notes on his translation, which disclose a wealth of information concerning textual problems he faced, editorial decisions he took, and his understanding of the text and its arguments. Methods The present paper analyses these notes, which have never been studied before, according to philosophical and philological methods. Results My analysis shows that Samuel is a philosophically engaged translator who approaches Alexander’s text with a text-critical attitude that enables him to render it in a more coherent and accessible form than that found in the Arabic manuscript that served as his source. Thus, this paper deepens our understanding of Samuel’s activity as a translator. Conclusions These results shows that we should take translators seriously as philosophical agents in their own right and compels us to study manuscripts that contain translations to find and explore the translators’ own voices within or next to their works. </ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20551.2
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Translator at Work: Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles’s Translation Notes on Alexander’s De Anima

Hanna Paulmann
Open Research Europe
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

A Translator at Work: Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles’s Translation Notes on Alexander’s De Anima

Hanna Paulmann
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p> Background Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles’s mid-fourteenth-century Hebrew translation of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s <ns3:italic>De anima</ns3:italic> , made from Isḥaq ibn Ḥunayn’s ninth-century Arabic translation of the original Greek, survives in four manuscripts. Three of these contain Samuel’s notes on his translation, which disclose a wealth of information concerning textual problems he faced, editorial decisions he took, and his understanding of the text and its arguments. Methods The present paper analyses these notes, which have never been studied before, according to philosophical and philological methods. Results My analysis shows that Samuel is a philosophically engaged translator who approaches Alexander’s text with a text-critical attitude that enables him to render it in a more coherent and accessible form than that found in the Arabic manuscript that served as his source. Thus, this paper deepens our understanding of Samuel’s activity as a translator. Conclusions These results shows that we should take translators seriously as philosophical agents in their own right and compels us to study manuscripts that contain translations to find and explore the translators’ own voices within or next to their works. </ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 5
Universität Hamburg (DE), HAW Hamburg (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.