Prediction of treatment outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Currently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems do not reliably predict outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma as patients with similar tumour stages and treatments often experience divergent outcomes. This study aimed to develop prediction models for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) based on routinely collected clinical parameters in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with (chemo)radiation to support personalised treatment strategies. Data from 996 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Hunan Cancer Hospital were used for model training, with 409 patients reserved for internal testing. An external cohort of 484 patients from the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College was used to validate the OS model. Eleven clinical variables were included with multivariate imputation applied to missing values. Highly correlated variables were excluded through pre-selection, followed by stepwise forward Cox regression modelling. Model performance was compared to AJCC staging for each endpoint. The OS model achieved good performance in both the training set (C-index = 0.73, 95% CI [0.68–0.77]), internal test set (0.71 [0.64–0.77]) and the external test set (0.67 [0.61–0.72]). Both OS and PFS models performed significantly better than the AJCC models (DeLong’s test: both p < 0.01). Models for OS, PFS and DC effectively stratified patients into low and high-risk groups with significantly different outcomes, demonstrating their potential to guide individualised treatment decision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15570-w
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of treatment outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Johannes A. Langendijk, Nanna M. Sijtsema, A. van der Schaaf, Lisanne V. van Dijk et al.
BMC Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Prediction of treatment outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Johannes A. Langendijk, Nanna M. Sijtsema, A. van der Schaaf, Lisanne V. van Dijk, Lihong Xi, T. Zhai, Guanzhi Zhou, Yingrui Shi, Pei Yang, Jun Li, Yan Li
article en

Abstract

Currently, the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems do not reliably predict outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma as patients with similar tumour stages and treatments often experience divergent outcomes. This study aimed to develop prediction models for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) based on routinely collected clinical parameters in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with (chemo)radiation to support personalised treatment strategies. Data from 996 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at Hunan Cancer Hospital were used for model training, with 409 patients reserved for internal testing. An external cohort of 484 patients from the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College was used to validate the OS model. Eleven clinical variables were included with multivariate imputation applied to missing values. Highly correlated variables were excluded through pre-selection, followed by stepwise forward Cox regression modelling. Model performance was compared to AJCC staging for each endpoint. The OS model achieved good performance in both the training set (C-index = 0.73, 95% CI [0.68–0.77]), internal test set (0.71 [0.64–0.77]) and the external test set (0.67 [0.61–0.72]). Both OS and PFS models performed significantly better than the AJCC models (DeLong’s test: both p < 0.01). Models for OS, PFS and DC effectively stratified patients into low and high-risk groups with significantly different outcomes, demonstrating their potential to guide individualised treatment decision.

BMC Cancer
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Central South University (CN), University of Groningen (NL), Shantou University (CN), Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care (CN), Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.