Physical activity for public health in the 21st century

With over 5 million attributed deaths per year, physical inactivity is a major global public health issue. Although the importance of physical activity is well recognized within the scope of obesity and cardiometabolic disease prevention and control, its broader benefits for the health of individuals and societies are yet to be fully harnessed. Furthermore, the role of active leisure, active transport and active labor-primary domains of physical activity-in supporting or hindering social and health equity has been largely overlooked. Here we (1) used a health equity lens to describe global domain-specific physical activity inequalities through an analysis of World Health Organization STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (WHO STEPS) data from 68 countries; (2) summarized evidence linking physical activity with health outcomes beyond cardiometabolic disease, including immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer; and (3) developed a new model reconceptualizing physical activity to better respond to 21st-century public health challenges. Our global, intersectional analysis of gender and socioeconomic physical activity inequalities revealed a 40-percentage-point gap in active leisure-the only domain consistently driven by choice-between historically privileged groups (wealthy men in high-income countries) and historically disadvantaged ones (poor women in low-income countries). Robust evidence supports the benefits of physical activity for immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer. Our reconceptualized model recognizes the influence of social identities, norms, policies and structures on physical activity for health and wellbeing and emphasizes the urgent need to develop and roll out policies and programs that disseminate and harness the full benefits of physical activity for human, societal and planetary health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Medicine
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04237-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
131.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical activity for public health in the 21st century

Eric J. Shiroma, M. R. Pratt, Erica Hinckson, Ruth Simpson et al.
4 citations
Nature Medicine
Physical Activity and Health
131.36
article

Physical activity for public health in the 21st century

Eric J. Shiroma, M. R. Pratt, Erica Hinckson, Ruth Simpson, Andrea Wendt, Inácio Crochemore-Silva, Andrea Ramirez Varela, Rodrigo Reis, Harold W. Kohl, Pedro C. Hallal, Jakob Tarp, James Sallis, Ester Cerin, Ding Ding, I-Min Lee, Ulf Ekelund, Adrian Bauman, Deborah Salvo, Youssouf Keita
article en
4 citations

Abstract

With over 5 million attributed deaths per year, physical inactivity is a major global public health issue. Although the importance of physical activity is well recognized within the scope of obesity and cardiometabolic disease prevention and control, its broader benefits for the health of individuals and societies are yet to be fully harnessed. Furthermore, the role of active leisure, active transport and active labor-primary domains of physical activity-in supporting or hindering social and health equity has been largely overlooked. Here we (1) used a health equity lens to describe global domain-specific physical activity inequalities through an analysis of World Health Organization STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance (WHO STEPS) data from 68 countries; (2) summarized evidence linking physical activity with health outcomes beyond cardiometabolic disease, including immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer; and (3) developed a new model reconceptualizing physical activity to better respond to 21st-century public health challenges. Our global, intersectional analysis of gender and socioeconomic physical activity inequalities revealed a 40-percentage-point gap in active leisure-the only domain consistently driven by choice-between historically privileged groups (wealthy men in high-income countries) and historically disadvantaged ones (poor women in low-income countries). Robust evidence supports the benefits of physical activity for immunity and infectious disease, depression and cancer. Our reconceptualized model recognizes the influence of social identities, norms, policies and structures on physical activity for health and wellbeing and emphasizes the urgent need to develop and roll out policies and programs that disseminate and harness the full benefits of physical activity for human, societal and planetary health.

Nature Medicine
Austin College (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), The University of Sydney (AU), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Harvard University (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Global Environment Facility (US), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (BR), Austin Community College (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of California San Diego (US), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Australian Catholic University (AU), University of Hong Kong (HK), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, David and Elaine Potter Foundation, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, NSW Ministry of Health, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Physical Activity and Health
131.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.