Multiplexity 2.0: power and pluralism in the post-liberal age

Abstract This article, and the special section in International Affairs it introduces, ask: how can we best read the post-liberal era of world politics? The resurgence of hard power has led many to turn to realism, even as a liberal lens reveals key features of the world we inherited. Meanwhile, diverse state and non-state actors around the globe are (re)asserting their voices in international affairs. This introduction to the special section builds on Amitav Acharya's work to offer a vision of ‘multiplexity 2.0’ that captures the interface of hard power, soft power and global diversity. It does so by unpacking the key components of Acharya's concept—‘multiplicity’ and ‘complexity’. Doing so, we contend, captures: 1) the rapidly multiplying set of actors, ideas and structural forces shaping our system's transformation, while 2) reading the interactions between these parameters through the lens of complexity theory. A ‘multiplicity + complexity = multiplexity 2.0’ approach captures non-linear, multidirectional patterns for an ultimately more ‘realistic’ reading of world (dis)order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Affairs
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiag027
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiplexity 2.0: power and pluralism in the post-liberal age

Indrajit Roy, Nora Elizabeth Fisher-Onar
International Affairs
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Multiplexity 2.0: power and pluralism in the post-liberal age

Indrajit Roy, Nora Elizabeth Fisher-Onar
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article, and the special section in International Affairs it introduces, ask: how can we best read the post-liberal era of world politics? The resurgence of hard power has led many to turn to realism, even as a liberal lens reveals key features of the world we inherited. Meanwhile, diverse state and non-state actors around the globe are (re)asserting their voices in international affairs. This introduction to the special section builds on Amitav Acharya's work to offer a vision of ‘multiplexity 2.0’ that captures the interface of hard power, soft power and global diversity. It does so by unpacking the key components of Acharya's concept—‘multiplicity’ and ‘complexity’. Doing so, we contend, captures: 1) the rapidly multiplying set of actors, ideas and structural forces shaping our system's transformation, while 2) reading the interactions between these parameters through the lens of complexity theory. A ‘multiplicity + complexity = multiplexity 2.0’ approach captures non-linear, multidirectional patterns for an ultimately more ‘realistic’ reading of world (dis)order.

International AffairsVol. 102(2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of York (GB), University of San Francisco (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.