Aquatic resource subsidies are more important than invasive lupine for ground-dwelling arthropod communities around Lake Mývatn

The effects of invasive plants on arthropod communities are highly variable, shaped not only by the resources these species introduce but also by the baseline availability of those resources in the invaded environment. In nutrient-poor ecosystems such as subarctic Iceland, nitrogen-fixing invaders may enhance litter quality and boost primary productivity, potentially benefiting arthropod communities. However, the extent of these effects likely depends on the presence of external nutrient inputs, such as aquatic resource subsidies. Interactions between plant invasions and aquatic subsidies likely have significant ecosystem consequences, yet their combined effects on arthropod communities remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how an invasive nitrogen-fixing lupine, Lupinus nootkatensis, and aquatic resource subsidy from the deposition of midge carcasses affected arthropod communities in subarctic heathlands. In 2013, we set up 2 × 2-m plots in native (“Heath,” n = 12) and lupine-invaded (“Invaded,” n = 12) heath vegetation and manipulated aquatic subsidies (control, inorganic KNO3, and midge carcasses) in experimental plots for 6 years (2013 – 2018). We sampled arthropods using pitfall traps and soil-core extractions via Berlese-Tullgren funnels. In both the Heath and Invaded plots, aquatic resource subsidies altered arthropod community composition, with the KNO3 and midge-addition plots containing more beetles and control plots containing more harvestmen and velvet mites. Increasing beetle densities were positively correlated with grass cover, whereas harvestmen and velvet mites were correlated with native heath shrubs (e.g., Betula nana and Vaccinium uliginosum). Lupine invasion had minimal effects on arthropod composition, as only the beetles were found in higher abundances in the Invaded plots. No other arthropod taxon responded to lupine invasion. These findings suggest that aquatic resource subsidies can influence arthropod communities in nutrient-poor ecosystems, but lupine invasion may be less important in determining arthropod community structure in these subarctic ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Ecology
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-026-10279-1
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aquatic resource subsidies are more important than invasive lupine for ground-dwelling arthropod communities around Lake Mývatn

Joseph S. Phillips, Jamieson C. Botsch, Emily Auerbach, Anthony R. Ives et al.
Aquatic Ecology
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
article

Aquatic resource subsidies are more important than invasive lupine for ground-dwelling arthropod communities around Lake Mývatn

Joseph S. Phillips, Jamieson C. Botsch, Emily Auerbach, Anthony R. Ives, Amanda R. McCormick, Matthew A. McCary
article en

Abstract

The effects of invasive plants on arthropod communities are highly variable, shaped not only by the resources these species introduce but also by the baseline availability of those resources in the invaded environment. In nutrient-poor ecosystems such as subarctic Iceland, nitrogen-fixing invaders may enhance litter quality and boost primary productivity, potentially benefiting arthropod communities. However, the extent of these effects likely depends on the presence of external nutrient inputs, such as aquatic resource subsidies. Interactions between plant invasions and aquatic subsidies likely have significant ecosystem consequences, yet their combined effects on arthropod communities remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how an invasive nitrogen-fixing lupine, Lupinus nootkatensis, and aquatic resource subsidy from the deposition of midge carcasses affected arthropod communities in subarctic heathlands. In 2013, we set up 2 × 2-m plots in native (“Heath,” n = 12) and lupine-invaded (“Invaded,” n = 12) heath vegetation and manipulated aquatic subsidies (control, inorganic KNO3, and midge carcasses) in experimental plots for 6 years (2013 – 2018). We sampled arthropods using pitfall traps and soil-core extractions via Berlese-Tullgren funnels. In both the Heath and Invaded plots, aquatic resource subsidies altered arthropod community composition, with the KNO3 and midge-addition plots containing more beetles and control plots containing more harvestmen and velvet mites. Increasing beetle densities were positively correlated with grass cover, whereas harvestmen and velvet mites were correlated with native heath shrubs (e.g., Betula nana and Vaccinium uliginosum). Lupine invasion had minimal effects on arthropod composition, as only the beetles were found in higher abundances in the Invaded plots. No other arthropod taxon responded to lupine invasion. These findings suggest that aquatic resource subsidies can influence arthropod communities in nutrient-poor ecosystems, but lupine invasion may be less important in determining arthropod community structure in these subarctic ecosystems.

Aquatic EcologyVol. 60(2)
Creighton University (US), University of North Carolina Health Care (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Austin Peay State University (US), Rice University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.