Developing self-regulation for generative AI through a metacognitive checklist: A case study of an in-service language teacher

Regulatory checklists are used in many areas of education and professional development because they can support metacognition and self-regulation, two fundamental processes for lifelong-learning, which may occur in an informal and autonomous fashion. Owing to its dynamic nature, technology in education perfectly fits within the paradigm of continuous, often informal, learning for professional development, and it is consequently useful to foster self-regulation in language teachers. This research reports on a case study of an in-service teacher using a regulatory checklist during a training on generative artificial intelligence (AI) for language teaching. The case shows that the checklist was helpful in aiding the teacher to develop proficiency in AI and the high-order thinking skills required to work with it and, most of all, self-regulation. The case is of interest because the teacher was driven by practical motivations, rather than theoretical and pedagogical ones, which explains how she used the checklist; for instance, she focused more on monitoring than evaluation. Implications for teacher training are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n4.103284
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing self-regulation for generative AI through a metacognitive checklist: A case study of an in-service language teacher

Simone Torsani
Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

Developing self-regulation for generative AI through a metacognitive checklist: A case study of an in-service language teacher

Simone Torsani
article en

Abstract

Regulatory checklists are used in many areas of education and professional development because they can support metacognition and self-regulation, two fundamental processes for lifelong-learning, which may occur in an informal and autonomous fashion. Owing to its dynamic nature, technology in education perfectly fits within the paradigm of continuous, often informal, learning for professional development, and it is consequently useful to foster self-regulation in language teachers. This research reports on a case study of an in-service teacher using a regulatory checklist during a training on generative artificial intelligence (AI) for language teaching. The case shows that the checklist was helpful in aiding the teacher to develop proficiency in AI and the high-order thinking skills required to work with it and, most of all, self-regulation. The case is of interest because the teacher was driven by practical motivations, rather than theoretical and pedagogical ones, which explains how she used the checklist; for instance, she focused more on monitoring than evaluation. Implications for teacher training are discussed.

Australian Journal of Applied LinguisticsVol. 8(4)
University of Genoa (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing self-regulation for generative AI through a metacognitive checklist: A case study of an in-service language teacher — Simone Torsani · Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS