Application of artificial intelligence in schizophrenia rehabilitation management: a systematic scoping review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in mental health, yet its rehabilitation-oriented applications in schizophrenia have not been systematically mapped. We conducted a systematic scoping review of PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library (January 1, 2012-October 31, 2025; two search rounds), applying operationalized rehabilitation boundaries and excluding diagnostics-only case-control studies. We extracted data on data sources, feature engineering, model families, validation, calibration, interpretability, application domains, outcomes and implementation readiness. Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria (median sample size 160; 55% longitudinal). Applications focused on symptom monitoring (48/83), medication management (19/83) and risk management (16/83), whereas functional training (1/83) and psychosocial support (3/83) were rarely targeted. Supervised learning predominated (53/83, 63.9%) over representation learning (20/83, 24%), most commonly using speech/text, electronic health records and smartphone sensing. Across classification tasks, the median AUC was 0.79 (IQR 0.71-0.86); relapse early-warning models showed a median sensitivity of 31.5% at 88.0% specificity. Only four studies reported external validation and three described closed-loop deployment, including one randomized trial that improved adherence. Proxy endpoints were more common than clinical endpoints, and reporting of calibration/uncertainty and fairness auditing was sparse. Overall, AI shows promise for monitoring, adherence support and relapse risk stratification, but routine-care deployment will require externally validated and calibrated human-in-the-loop decision support, privacy-preserving multimodal pipelines and pragmatic trials targeting functional outcomes and participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-03872-3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of artificial intelligence in schizophrenia rehabilitation management: a systematic scoping review

Fumie Muroi, Fangyuan Chang, Hongyi Yang, Weibo Zhang et al.
Translational Psychiatry
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Application of artificial intelligence in schizophrenia rehabilitation management: a systematic scoping review

Fumie Muroi, Fangyuan Chang, Hongyi Yang, Weibo Zhang, Zhao Liu, Jun Cai
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in mental health, yet its rehabilitation-oriented applications in schizophrenia have not been systematically mapped. We conducted a systematic scoping review of PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and the ACM Digital Library (January 1, 2012-October 31, 2025; two search rounds), applying operationalized rehabilitation boundaries and excluding diagnostics-only case-control studies. We extracted data on data sources, feature engineering, model families, validation, calibration, interpretability, application domains, outcomes and implementation readiness. Eighty-three studies met inclusion criteria (median sample size 160; 55% longitudinal). Applications focused on symptom monitoring (48/83), medication management (19/83) and risk management (16/83), whereas functional training (1/83) and psychosocial support (3/83) were rarely targeted. Supervised learning predominated (53/83, 63.9%) over representation learning (20/83, 24%), most commonly using speech/text, electronic health records and smartphone sensing. Across classification tasks, the median AUC was 0.79 (IQR 0.71-0.86); relapse early-warning models showed a median sensitivity of 31.5% at 88.0% specificity. Only four studies reported external validation and three described closed-loop deployment, including one randomized trial that improved adherence. Proxy endpoints were more common than clinical endpoints, and reporting of calibration/uncertainty and fairness auditing was sparse. Overall, AI shows promise for monitoring, adherence support and relapse risk stratification, but routine-care deployment will require externally validated and calibrated human-in-the-loop decision support, privacy-preserving multimodal pipelines and pragmatic trials targeting functional outcomes and participation.

Translational Psychiatry
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Shanghai Mental Health Center (CN)
University of Pennsylvania, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, University of California, San Diego
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.