Optimizing hospital waste management in Morocco: a hybrid multi-criteria decision framework

• Reorients hybrid MCDM application from technology selection toward internal hospital process optimization. • Identifies segregation accuracy and regulatory compliance as dominant performance drivers in Moroccan hospitals. • It shows that behavior-centered interventions can generate stronger impact than high-cost technological upgrades. • Provides a pragmatic decision-support framework adapted to operational constraints in Moroccan healthcare institutions. Hospital waste management remains a critical operational and regulatory challenge, especially in health care systems where security risks, compliance pressures and resource constraints are all combined. Although multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches are widely used in waste research in the healthcare sector, most studies focus mainly on the choice of treatment technology rather than on the priority of improving internal processes in hospitals. The study develops and applies a structured framework for decision support, integrating BWM and TOPSIS, to support improvements in hospital waste management in Moroccan health care institutions. Six evaluation criteria were developed by synthesis of literature and consultation with experts, and sixteen experienced experts were involved in the evaluation process. The hybrid framework allows expert judgement to be translated into a coherent prioritization of improvement strategies. The results show that the most important priorities are to reduce sorting errors, strengthen health and safety and ensure regulatory compliance. The most effective strategies were process-oriented interventions, in particular visual guidance and targeted training. By moving the focus from technology choice to internal operational optimization, the study shows how a pragmatic hybrid MCDM framework can be effectively adapted to health systems characterized by structural constraints and scarce resources and provides practical guidance for hospital administrators and policy makers in Morocco.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Waste Management Bulletin
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100288
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing hospital waste management in Morocco: a hybrid multi-criteria decision framework

Hassan Gziri, Yassine Zahidi, Wafaa Dachry, Maha Rezzai et al.
Waste Management Bulletin
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
article

Optimizing hospital waste management in Morocco: a hybrid multi-criteria decision framework

Hassan Gziri, Yassine Zahidi, Wafaa Dachry, Maha Rezzai, Mohamed El Moufid, Yousra Louhab, Hicham Medromi
article en

Abstract

• Reorients hybrid MCDM application from technology selection toward internal hospital process optimization. • Identifies segregation accuracy and regulatory compliance as dominant performance drivers in Moroccan hospitals. • It shows that behavior-centered interventions can generate stronger impact than high-cost technological upgrades. • Provides a pragmatic decision-support framework adapted to operational constraints in Moroccan healthcare institutions. Hospital waste management remains a critical operational and regulatory challenge, especially in health care systems where security risks, compliance pressures and resource constraints are all combined. Although multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches are widely used in waste research in the healthcare sector, most studies focus mainly on the choice of treatment technology rather than on the priority of improving internal processes in hospitals. The study develops and applies a structured framework for decision support, integrating BWM and TOPSIS, to support improvements in hospital waste management in Moroccan health care institutions. Six evaluation criteria were developed by synthesis of literature and consultation with experts, and sixteen experienced experts were involved in the evaluation process. The hybrid framework allows expert judgement to be translated into a coherent prioritization of improvement strategies. The results show that the most important priorities are to reduce sorting errors, strengthen health and safety and ensure regulatory compliance. The most effective strategies were process-oriented interventions, in particular visual guidance and targeted training. By moving the focus from technology choice to internal operational optimization, the study shows how a pragmatic hybrid MCDM framework can be effectively adapted to health systems characterized by structural constraints and scarce resources and provides practical guidance for hospital administrators and policy makers in Morocco.

Waste Management BulletinVol. 4(1)
Foundation for Biomedical Research (US), Francophone University Association (CA), Instituts Supérieurs des Professions Infirmières et Techniques de Santé (MA), Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB), Université Hassan 1er (MA), Société Francophone du Diabète (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.