Heat meter performance downstream of bends and the asymmetric swirl generator

Abstract Heat meters are sensitive to non-ideal flow conditions and are therefore tested during type approval using standardized disturbances. EN 1434 employs the asymmetric swirl generator (ASG) installed 7 pipe diameters (7 D ) upstream of the meter as a substitute for real bends, assuming it approximates bend-induced flow conditions even at short installation lengths such as 0 D . This study investigates the validity of this assumption through measurements with 14 commercially available heat meters in DN 15 and DN 25. It is found that while the ASG at 7 D reproduces the double bend at 5 D , both single and double bends at 0 D cause substantially larger faults. Four meters exceeded the maximum permissible error (MPE) downstream of a bend configuration, yet only two were detected by the ASG. Four additional meters operated close to the MPE and, considering angular sensitivity, would likely exceed it at other orientations, yielding up to 6 of 14 potential false negatives. Furthermore, the ASG at 0 D caused the largest meter faults, indicating that disturbances involving flow recirculation may be even more severe than bends. Implications for future revisions of EN 1434 include adding a second disturbance generator or using real bends, and evaluating whether disturbances that induce recirculation should be included.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
tm - Technisches Messen
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2026-0003
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat meter performance downstream of bends and the asymmetric swirl generator

Thomas Eichler, M. Straka, Katja Hertha-Dunkel, Stefan Rademacher et al.
tm - Technisches Messen
Flow Measurement and Analysis
article

Heat meter performance downstream of bends and the asymmetric swirl generator

Thomas Eichler, M. Straka, Katja Hertha-Dunkel, Stefan Rademacher, Reinhard Kernebeck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Heat meters are sensitive to non-ideal flow conditions and are therefore tested during type approval using standardized disturbances. EN 1434 employs the asymmetric swirl generator (ASG) installed 7 pipe diameters (7 D ) upstream of the meter as a substitute for real bends, assuming it approximates bend-induced flow conditions even at short installation lengths such as 0 D . This study investigates the validity of this assumption through measurements with 14 commercially available heat meters in DN 15 and DN 25. It is found that while the ASG at 7 D reproduces the double bend at 5 D , both single and double bends at 0 D cause substantially larger faults. Four meters exceeded the maximum permissible error (MPE) downstream of a bend configuration, yet only two were detected by the ASG. Four additional meters operated close to the MPE and, considering angular sensitivity, would likely exceed it at other orientations, yielding up to 6 of 14 potential false negatives. Furthermore, the ASG at 0 D caused the largest meter faults, indicating that disturbances involving flow recirculation may be even more severe than bends. Implications for future revisions of EN 1434 include adding a second disturbance generator or using real bends, and evaluating whether disturbances that induce recirculation should be included.

tm - Technisches Messen
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.