The European Union in the Indo‐Pacific: Gauging the EU's Indo‐Pacific Strategy Across Eight Indo‐Pacific Locations

ABSTRACT This article offers a macro‐overview of the reception and effectiveness of the European Union's (EU) Indo‐Pacific Strategy (IPS) released in April 2021. Drawing on research conducted across eight Indo‐Pacific locations—Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand—the study involved 111 semi‐structured interviews with foreign policy decision‐makers and influencers, supplemented by policy sandpit workshops in each location. The research reveals that while the EU maintains strong bilateral relationships across the Indo‐Pacific and is positively viewed in all examined locations, its effectiveness as a strategic actor remains constrained. The EU demonstrates specific credibility in three key areas: climate action, economic engagement and digital governance. However, significant weaknesses persist most notably the EU's perceived limited capacity in security and defence matters—the dominant concern in Indo‐Pacific geopolitics. The research also highlights challenges stemming from the Indo‐Pacific's inherent heterogeneity and limited awareness of the IPS itself among key stakeholders. Based on these findings, the article proposes two potential pathways forward: an evolutionary approach focusing on core strengths through a revised IPS 2.0 and a revolutionary approach abandoning the overarching strategy in favour of strengthening bilateral engagement. The analysis underscores the importance of aligning the EU's self‐conception with regional expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70151
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Union in the Indo‐Pacific: Gauging the EU's Indo‐Pacific Strategy Across Eight Indo‐Pacific Locations

Nicholas Ross Smith, Martin Holland
Global Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The European Union in the Indo‐Pacific: Gauging the EU's Indo‐Pacific Strategy Across Eight Indo‐Pacific Locations

Nicholas Ross Smith, Martin Holland
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article offers a macro‐overview of the reception and effectiveness of the European Union's (EU) Indo‐Pacific Strategy (IPS) released in April 2021. Drawing on research conducted across eight Indo‐Pacific locations—Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand—the study involved 111 semi‐structured interviews with foreign policy decision‐makers and influencers, supplemented by policy sandpit workshops in each location. The research reveals that while the EU maintains strong bilateral relationships across the Indo‐Pacific and is positively viewed in all examined locations, its effectiveness as a strategic actor remains constrained. The EU demonstrates specific credibility in three key areas: climate action, economic engagement and digital governance. However, significant weaknesses persist most notably the EU's perceived limited capacity in security and defence matters—the dominant concern in Indo‐Pacific geopolitics. The research also highlights challenges stemming from the Indo‐Pacific's inherent heterogeneity and limited awareness of the IPS itself among key stakeholders. Based on these findings, the article proposes two potential pathways forward: an evolutionary approach focusing on core strengths through a revised IPS 2.0 and a revolutionary approach abandoning the overarching strategy in favour of strengthening bilateral engagement. The analysis underscores the importance of aligning the EU's self‐conception with regional expectations.

Global Policy
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.