Three Enslaved Husbands: Layers of Enslavement in the Early Modern Crimean Khanate

Abstract This article investigates the layers of slave status in the Crimean Khanate through court records involving three enslaved men who had married freewomen. These unions—situated within the intersectional overlapping of legal structures, social hierarchies, and collective memory—reveal the tensions inherent in a society where the boundaries between freedom and enslavement, while somewhat porous, were persistent and deeply consequential. Viewing these asymmetrical relationships through a micro-historical lens, the article shows how the legal conundrums arising from the marriage of a freewoman and an enslaved husband destabilize our conventional notions of ownership, guardianship, and authority. In doing so it sheds light on the broader legal and theological doctrines of the Ḥanafī Islamic jurisprudence that governed manumission, social integration, and the evolving status of the formerly enslaved. By questioning the binary of ‘enslaved’ and ‘free’, the article demonstrates that manumission did not initiate a definitive rupture with slave status but rather a forward move within a continuum of constrained personal agency and still-negotiable social status and personal identity. This demonstration should encourage a reconsideration of marital relationships in a society where enslavement operated not simply as a legal designation but as an omnipresent structure shaping personal lives, social hierarchies, and juridical thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic Studies
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etag002
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Enslaved Husbands: Layers of Enslavement in the Early Modern Crimean Khanate

Fırat Yaşa
Journal of Islamic Studies
Islamic Studies and History
article

Three Enslaved Husbands: Layers of Enslavement in the Early Modern Crimean Khanate

Fırat Yaşa
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the layers of slave status in the Crimean Khanate through court records involving three enslaved men who had married freewomen. These unions—situated within the intersectional overlapping of legal structures, social hierarchies, and collective memory—reveal the tensions inherent in a society where the boundaries between freedom and enslavement, while somewhat porous, were persistent and deeply consequential. Viewing these asymmetrical relationships through a micro-historical lens, the article shows how the legal conundrums arising from the marriage of a freewoman and an enslaved husband destabilize our conventional notions of ownership, guardianship, and authority. In doing so it sheds light on the broader legal and theological doctrines of the Ḥanafī Islamic jurisprudence that governed manumission, social integration, and the evolving status of the formerly enslaved. By questioning the binary of ‘enslaved’ and ‘free’, the article demonstrates that manumission did not initiate a definitive rupture with slave status but rather a forward move within a continuum of constrained personal agency and still-negotiable social status and personal identity. This demonstration should encourage a reconsideration of marital relationships in a society where enslavement operated not simply as a legal designation but as an omnipresent structure shaping personal lives, social hierarchies, and juridical thought.

Journal of Islamic Studies
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.