Politics and Financial Development: Is Populist Leadership Important?

ABSTRACT Political factors have an essential role to play in financial development. Populism is one of them that still has not captured sufficient attention in the existing body of literature. This paper aims to address this gap based on empirical data analysis from 59 countries worldwide over the years 1997–2021. Obtained results show that populist political leadership has had beneficial effects on financial institutions development, while being significantly detrimental for financial markets development. Additionally, increased level of development of the banking sector raised the possibility of electoral success of populist political movements, while the opposite was true for stock and debt securities markets. The proportion of female legislators in national parliaments and rule of law acted as stimulators of financial institutions development. The findings also show that central government debt, population and research and development expenditure constituted significant catalysts of financial markets development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Politics
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70043
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politics and Financial Development: Is Populist Leadership Important?

Wojciech Przychodzeń
Economics and Politics
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Politics and Financial Development: Is Populist Leadership Important?

Wojciech Przychodzeń
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Political factors have an essential role to play in financial development. Populism is one of them that still has not captured sufficient attention in the existing body of literature. This paper aims to address this gap based on empirical data analysis from 59 countries worldwide over the years 1997–2021. Obtained results show that populist political leadership has had beneficial effects on financial institutions development, while being significantly detrimental for financial markets development. Additionally, increased level of development of the banking sector raised the possibility of electoral success of populist political movements, while the opposite was true for stock and debt securities markets. The proportion of female legislators in national parliaments and rule of law acted as stimulators of financial institutions development. The findings also show that central government debt, population and research and development expenditure constituted significant catalysts of financial markets development.

Economics and Politics
EADA Business School (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Politics and Financial Development: Is Populist Leadership Important? — Wojciech Przychodzeń · Economics and Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS