Heat and Mass Transfer Redistribution Under Clamping Pressure in PEM Fuel Cell: A Coupled CFD–FEA Multiphase Non‐Isothermal Study With Fast Surrogate‐Based Optimization

ABSTRACT Clamping pressure applied during proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) assembly reduces interfacial contact resistance but impedes mass transport, yielding coupled beneficial and adverse effects on performance, which makes its optimal specification nontrivial. This study establishes an integrated framework that couples three‐dimensional multiphase non‐isothermal computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with two‐dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) and data‐driven surrogate modeling to quantify these interactions and to enable rapid optimization. Deformation induced changes in geometry, gas diffusion layer porosity and permeability, and pressure dependent interfacial contact resistance are propagated into the transport and electrochemical model. Three surrogate models, namely the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), support vector regression (SVR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) are trained on the coupled CFD and FEA dataset to predict power density over the design space of operating voltage and clamping pressure. Results reveal region‐specific effects of clamping pressure: In the activation‐loss‐dominated regime, performance is low and insensitive to pressure; in the ohmic‐loss‐dominated regime, power density peaks at moderate pressure; in the concentration‐loss‐dominated regime, power density decreases monotonically with increasing pressure. All surrogate models achieved R 2 values exceeding 0.995, with fast predictions. Coupled CFD‐FEA simulation yielded a maximum power density of 0.777 W·cm −2 , with a recommended range of 0.75–1.25 MPa clamping pressure and 0.60–0.65 V voltage. The artificial intelligence‐genetic algorithm framework refined it to 0.8–1.2 MPa and 0.61–0.63 V, where the predicted power density consistently exceeds 0.78 W·cm −2 . These findings provide quantitative insights for the optimal assembly and operation of PEMFCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel Cells
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.70062
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat and Mass Transfer Redistribution Under Clamping Pressure in PEM Fuel Cell: A Coupled CFD–FEA Multiphase Non‐Isothermal Study With Fast Surrogate‐Based Optimization

Jianmin Wu, Guoqiu Liu, Lei Chen
Fuel Cells
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Heat and Mass Transfer Redistribution Under Clamping Pressure in PEM Fuel Cell: A Coupled CFD–FEA Multiphase Non‐Isothermal Study With Fast Surrogate‐Based Optimization

Jianmin Wu, Guoqiu Liu, Lei Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Clamping pressure applied during proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) assembly reduces interfacial contact resistance but impedes mass transport, yielding coupled beneficial and adverse effects on performance, which makes its optimal specification nontrivial. This study establishes an integrated framework that couples three‐dimensional multiphase non‐isothermal computational fluid dynamics (CFD) with two‐dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) and data‐driven surrogate modeling to quantify these interactions and to enable rapid optimization. Deformation induced changes in geometry, gas diffusion layer porosity and permeability, and pressure dependent interfacial contact resistance are propagated into the transport and electrochemical model. Three surrogate models, namely the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), support vector regression (SVR), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) are trained on the coupled CFD and FEA dataset to predict power density over the design space of operating voltage and clamping pressure. Results reveal region‐specific effects of clamping pressure: In the activation‐loss‐dominated regime, performance is low and insensitive to pressure; in the ohmic‐loss‐dominated regime, power density peaks at moderate pressure; in the concentration‐loss‐dominated regime, power density decreases monotonically with increasing pressure. All surrogate models achieved R 2 values exceeding 0.995, with fast predictions. Coupled CFD‐FEA simulation yielded a maximum power density of 0.777 W·cm −2 , with a recommended range of 0.75–1.25 MPa clamping pressure and 0.60–0.65 V voltage. The artificial intelligence‐genetic algorithm framework refined it to 0.8–1.2 MPa and 0.61–0.63 V, where the predicted power density consistently exceeds 0.78 W·cm −2 . These findings provide quantitative insights for the optimal assembly and operation of PEMFCs.

Fuel CellsVol. 26(2)
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Heat and Mass Transfer Redistribution Under Clamping Pressure in PEM Fuel Cell: A Coupled CFD–FEA Multiphase Non‐Isothermal Study With Fast Surrogate‐Based Optimization — Jianmin Wu, Guoqiu Liu, et al. · Fuel Cells (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS