The Macroeconomic Drivers of Carbon Emissions in East Africa: Capital‐Driven Versus Trade‐Driven Globalization

ABSTRACT East Africa has recorded strong economic growth over the past three decades alongside a steady rise in carbon emissions, raising concerns about whether the region can sustain growth without worsening environmental pressures. This study incorporates key macroeconomic drivers of carbon emissions using panel data for 9 countries from 1990 to 2023, aiming to differentiate between capital‐driven and trade‐driven globalization. Additionally, the output‐emissions nexus is re‐examined. Empirical analysis employs the panel fully modified ordinary least squares with robustness checks for heterogeneity and cross‐section independence, using panel quantile regression and fixed effects with Driscoll and Kraay standard errors. The results show, first, strong support for the pollution haven hypothesis, as FDI consistently raises emissions across specifications. Second, the environmental effect of trade is mixed and conditional. Trade appears pollutions‐increasing in simple nonlinear models (without controls) but becomes insignificant once controls are imposed. An emissions‐reducing effect emerges in specifications modeling income nonlinearity and at higher emissions quantiles. Third, the income‐emissions nexus follows a monotonic cubic form with a single inflection point, where emissions rise with income at an increasing rate initially, before beginning to decelerate at higher income levels. Finally, urbanization, financial development, and especially energy intensity are robust positive drivers of emissions. The results emphasize the need for stronger environmental governance around FDI, cleaner trade integration, and reforms that reduce energy intensity and guide urban and financial development toward a low‐carbon path. We discuss other policy recommendations based on the findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70841
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Macroeconomic Drivers of Carbon Emissions in East Africa: Capital‐Driven Versus Trade‐Driven Globalization

Princewill Okwoche, Emmanuel Aondongusha Asue, Abdiaziz Abdikadir Ahmed
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

The Macroeconomic Drivers of Carbon Emissions in East Africa: Capital‐Driven Versus Trade‐Driven Globalization

Princewill Okwoche, Emmanuel Aondongusha Asue, Abdiaziz Abdikadir Ahmed
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT East Africa has recorded strong economic growth over the past three decades alongside a steady rise in carbon emissions, raising concerns about whether the region can sustain growth without worsening environmental pressures. This study incorporates key macroeconomic drivers of carbon emissions using panel data for 9 countries from 1990 to 2023, aiming to differentiate between capital‐driven and trade‐driven globalization. Additionally, the output‐emissions nexus is re‐examined. Empirical analysis employs the panel fully modified ordinary least squares with robustness checks for heterogeneity and cross‐section independence, using panel quantile regression and fixed effects with Driscoll and Kraay standard errors. The results show, first, strong support for the pollution haven hypothesis, as FDI consistently raises emissions across specifications. Second, the environmental effect of trade is mixed and conditional. Trade appears pollutions‐increasing in simple nonlinear models (without controls) but becomes insignificant once controls are imposed. An emissions‐reducing effect emerges in specifications modeling income nonlinearity and at higher emissions quantiles. Third, the income‐emissions nexus follows a monotonic cubic form with a single inflection point, where emissions rise with income at an increasing rate initially, before beginning to decelerate at higher income levels. Finally, urbanization, financial development, and especially energy intensity are robust positive drivers of emissions. The results emphasize the need for stronger environmental governance around FDI, cleaner trade integration, and reforms that reduce energy intensity and guide urban and financial development toward a low‐carbon path. We discuss other policy recommendations based on the findings.

Sustainable Development
Namibia University of Science and Technology (NA), University of Cape Town (ZA), University of South Africa (ZA), Benue State University (NG)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.