Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Truth Queries to Address Online Misinformation in a Polarized Context

ABSTRACT Social truth queries (STQs)—user replies that draw attention to the truth—have shown promise for reducing misinformation belief, but their effectiveness in polarized contexts remains unexplored. To address this gap, we conducted three experiments using fans of established sports team rivalries to manipulate group identity. Participants judged the truth of social media posts containing misinformation that appeared with or without STQ replies. We investigated whether STQs were effective when posted by in‐group or out‐group members (Experiment 1), in addressing in‐group‐ or out‐group‐favorable misinformation (Experiment 2), and across combinations of poster identity and misinformation favorability (Experiment 3). We found that STQs were similarly effective in reducing misinformation belief across STQ source and misinformation favorability, although follow‐up analysis revealed more robust effects in addressing out‐group (vs. in‐group) favorable misinformation. Taken together, our findings suggest that social truth queries are a promising intervention for addressing misinformation in polarized contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.70185
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Truth Queries to Address Online Misinformation in a Polarized Context

Amabel Youngbin Jeon, Madeline Jalbert
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Truth Queries to Address Online Misinformation in a Polarized Context

Amabel Youngbin Jeon, Madeline Jalbert
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social truth queries (STQs)—user replies that draw attention to the truth—have shown promise for reducing misinformation belief, but their effectiveness in polarized contexts remains unexplored. To address this gap, we conducted three experiments using fans of established sports team rivalries to manipulate group identity. Participants judged the truth of social media posts containing misinformation that appeared with or without STQ replies. We investigated whether STQs were effective when posted by in‐group or out‐group members (Experiment 1), in addressing in‐group‐ or out‐group‐favorable misinformation (Experiment 2), and across combinations of poster identity and misinformation favorability (Experiment 3). We found that STQs were similarly effective in reducing misinformation belief across STQ source and misinformation favorability, although follow‐up analysis revealed more robust effects in addressing out‐group (vs. in‐group) favorable misinformation. Taken together, our findings suggest that social truth queries are a promising intervention for addressing misinformation in polarized contexts.

Applied Cognitive PsychologyVol. 40(2)
University of Southern California (US), Washington Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.