A Mixed‐Methods Exploration of Mobile Payment Resistance at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Understanding the Rural–Urban Dichotomy

ABSTRACT The swift growth of mobile technology has spurred the adoption of mobile payment systems (MPS) among middle‐ and high‐income groups in emerging economies. However, MPS penetration remains low in the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) segment, necessitating further study. Current research on MPS adoption often shows a pro‐innovation bias, potentially overlooking resistance and challenges faced by BOP populations. This study examines MPS resistance among the BOP population, with a focus on both rural and urban segments, and is grounded in Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT). Employing a mixed‐methods approach, the research uses an exploratory sequential design. 15 semi‐structured interviews were conducted in the qualitative phase with BOP non‐users, selected via purposive sampling across diverse rural and urban locations. Thematic analysis of transcripts identified key factors constituting MPS resistance, informing the design of a structured quantitative survey. The administered survey gathered 354 responses from BOP participants using purposive sampling. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 23.0, with structural equation modelling employed to test and validate the conceptual model. The study identifies usage, value, tradition, and risk barriers, as well as anxiety and technological alienation, as significant predictors of MPS resistance, with tradition barriers being the most substantial. Moderation analysis reveals that BOP type (rural vs. urban) significantly influences these relationships, with rural individuals exhibiting higher resistance due to elevated concerns about risk, tradition, and technological alienation. This research extends IRT by incorporating affective dimensions such as anxiety and alienation. Findings highlight the need for culturally and contextually sensitive, gradual introduction of MPS in BOP communities to enhance financial inclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70198
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed‐Methods Exploration of Mobile Payment Resistance at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Understanding the Rural–Urban Dichotomy

Rohit Joshi, Nandakumar Mekoth, U. Abhinaya
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

A Mixed‐Methods Exploration of Mobile Payment Resistance at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Understanding the Rural–Urban Dichotomy

Rohit Joshi, Nandakumar Mekoth, U. Abhinaya
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The swift growth of mobile technology has spurred the adoption of mobile payment systems (MPS) among middle‐ and high‐income groups in emerging economies. However, MPS penetration remains low in the bottom of the pyramid (BOP) segment, necessitating further study. Current research on MPS adoption often shows a pro‐innovation bias, potentially overlooking resistance and challenges faced by BOP populations. This study examines MPS resistance among the BOP population, with a focus on both rural and urban segments, and is grounded in Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT). Employing a mixed‐methods approach, the research uses an exploratory sequential design. 15 semi‐structured interviews were conducted in the qualitative phase with BOP non‐users, selected via purposive sampling across diverse rural and urban locations. Thematic analysis of transcripts identified key factors constituting MPS resistance, informing the design of a structured quantitative survey. The administered survey gathered 354 responses from BOP participants using purposive sampling. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 23.0, with structural equation modelling employed to test and validate the conceptual model. The study identifies usage, value, tradition, and risk barriers, as well as anxiety and technological alienation, as significant predictors of MPS resistance, with tradition barriers being the most substantial. Moderation analysis reveals that BOP type (rural vs. urban) significantly influences these relationships, with rural individuals exhibiting higher resistance due to elevated concerns about risk, tradition, and technological alienation. This research extends IRT by incorporating affective dimensions such as anxiety and alienation. Findings highlight the need for culturally and contextually sensitive, gradual introduction of MPS in BOP communities to enhance financial inclusion.

International Journal of Consumer StudiesVol. 50(2)
Goa University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Goa (IN), Medi-Caps University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.