Forest management and carbon market integration at Clemson University forest

Forest carbon offset programs are emerging as critical tools in mitigating climate change that support sustainable forest management. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration potential and economic viability of 13 distinct forest management scenarios using forest growth simulator (FVS) under both the Climate Action Reserve (CAR) and the American Carbon Registry (ACR) offset protocols. Scenarios included intensive practices such as clear-cutting with artificial regeneration, intermediate treatments like thinning and shelterwood, and passive approaches such as no management and prescribed burning. The no management (M0) scenario yielded the highest cumulative carbon storage but lacked the economic returns necessary for landowners' profit from selling the timber at mills. Conversely, high-grading and repeated clear-cutting scenarios resulted in lower carbon sequestration but higher net present value (NPV) for pine, but less for hardwood and mixed. Notably, the CAR protocol consistently generated greater offsets than ACR due to differences in baseline assumptions and accounting methodologies. This research highlights the trade-offs between carbon sequestration and economic returns. These findings offer actionable insights for landowners, policymakers, and offset program designers aiming to enhance climate benefits through forest management strategies. • Forest carbon offset programs help address climate change while supporting sustainable forest management. • This study evaluated 13 forest management scenarios using FVS under CAR and ACR carbon offset protocols. • M5, M9, and M10 scenarios produced higher NPVs across pine, hardwood, and mixed forest stands. • CAR produced higher carbon offsets than ACR due to differences in baseline assumptions and accounting methods. • Analysis shows a trade-off between maximizing carbon storage and economic returns in forest management planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.114736
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest management and carbon market integration at Clemson University forest

Puskar Khanal, Lucas Clay
Ecological Indicators
Forest Management and Policy
article

Forest management and carbon market integration at Clemson University forest

Puskar Khanal, Lucas Clay
article en

Abstract

Forest carbon offset programs are emerging as critical tools in mitigating climate change that support sustainable forest management. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration potential and economic viability of 13 distinct forest management scenarios using forest growth simulator (FVS) under both the Climate Action Reserve (CAR) and the American Carbon Registry (ACR) offset protocols. Scenarios included intensive practices such as clear-cutting with artificial regeneration, intermediate treatments like thinning and shelterwood, and passive approaches such as no management and prescribed burning. The no management (M0) scenario yielded the highest cumulative carbon storage but lacked the economic returns necessary for landowners' profit from selling the timber at mills. Conversely, high-grading and repeated clear-cutting scenarios resulted in lower carbon sequestration but higher net present value (NPV) for pine, but less for hardwood and mixed. Notably, the CAR protocol consistently generated greater offsets than ACR due to differences in baseline assumptions and accounting methodologies. This research highlights the trade-offs between carbon sequestration and economic returns. These findings offer actionable insights for landowners, policymakers, and offset program designers aiming to enhance climate benefits through forest management strategies. • Forest carbon offset programs help address climate change while supporting sustainable forest management. • This study evaluated 13 forest management scenarios using FVS under CAR and ACR carbon offset protocols. • M5, M9, and M10 scenarios produced higher NPVs across pine, hardwood, and mixed forest stands. • CAR produced higher carbon offsets than ACR due to differences in baseline assumptions and accounting methods. • Analysis shows a trade-off between maximizing carbon storage and economic returns in forest management planning.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 185
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forest management and carbon market integration at Clemson University forest — Puskar Khanal, Lucas Clay · Ecological Indicators (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS