Enhancing General and Academic <scp>L2</scp> Writing Complexity Through Dialogue Journal Writing: The Role of Learners' Motivational Beliefs

Abstract Writing is crucial in tertiary education, yet enhancing the complexity of academic writing presents significant challenges for second language (L2) learners. This study explores the potential of dialogue journal writing (DJW), an interactive and low‐stress classroom activity, to enhance writing complexity among novice L2 writers. Employing a mixed‐methods research (MMR) design, we investigated the effects of DJW and learners' motivational beliefs on the syntactic and lexical complexity of L2 writings over one academic year. Forty‐nine first‐year undergraduates from a Taiwanese technical university participated, producing nine general writings in the first semester and seven academic writings in the second. Learners' motivational beliefs, including self‐efficacy and interest, were elicited from reflections and quantized as categorical variables for analysis using a reflective coding‐based approach. Mixed effects modeling assessed changes in syntactic and lexical complexity and the impact of motivational beliefs. Results indicated that DJW significantly enhanced syntactic complexity in both general and academic writing, but lexical complexity improved only in general writing. The non‐significant findings regarding motivational beliefs suggest a potentially nuanced relationship with writing complexity. This study demonstrates how fluency‐building interactive writing practices can bridge the gap between novice and intermediate L2 writers and contributes to the application of MMR in L2 writing research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TESOL Quarterly
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70080
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing General and Academic L2 Writing Complexity Through Dialogue Journal Writing: The Role of Learners' Motivational Beliefs

Brian V. Rusk, Xiaoke Bai, Barry Lee Reynolds
TESOL Quarterly
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Enhancing General and Academic L2 Writing Complexity Through Dialogue Journal Writing: The Role of Learners' Motivational Beliefs

Brian V. Rusk, Xiaoke Bai, Barry Lee Reynolds
article en

Abstract

Abstract Writing is crucial in tertiary education, yet enhancing the complexity of academic writing presents significant challenges for second language (L2) learners. This study explores the potential of dialogue journal writing (DJW), an interactive and low‐stress classroom activity, to enhance writing complexity among novice L2 writers. Employing a mixed‐methods research (MMR) design, we investigated the effects of DJW and learners' motivational beliefs on the syntactic and lexical complexity of L2 writings over one academic year. Forty‐nine first‐year undergraduates from a Taiwanese technical university participated, producing nine general writings in the first semester and seven academic writings in the second. Learners' motivational beliefs, including self‐efficacy and interest, were elicited from reflections and quantized as categorical variables for analysis using a reflective coding‐based approach. Mixed effects modeling assessed changes in syntactic and lexical complexity and the impact of motivational beliefs. Results indicated that DJW significantly enhanced syntactic complexity in both general and academic writing, but lexical complexity improved only in general writing. The non‐significant findings regarding motivational beliefs suggest a potentially nuanced relationship with writing complexity. This study demonstrates how fluency‐building interactive writing practices can bridge the gap between novice and intermediate L2 writers and contributes to the application of MMR in L2 writing research.

TESOL Quarterly
University of Macau (MO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.