Strain Type‐Curve Analysis During Recovery Using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression for Evaluating Confined Reservoir Properties

ABSTRACT Pressure changes in reservoirs lead to strain in the overlying confining unit, which can be measured near the ground surface using high‐precision strainmeters. We propose a methodology that adapts the classic Agarwal type curves used for analyzing recovery pressure data to interpret strain data. Poroelastic analyses indicate that plotting components of the strain tensor as a function of Agarwal time creates semi‐log straight lines. The average horizontal and vertical strains intersect the zero‐strain axis at times that are similar to the times determined using a similar analysis of the pressure. The intersection time gives a direct estimate of the hydraulic diffusivity. The relationship between the transformational strain and reservoir permeability, specific storage and porosity‐to‐fluid compressibility ratio was established using an Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR) model. The model was trained and validated for different scenarios with the outlined reservoir parameters as inputs and simulated transformational strain as outputs. The result is an accurate model with good generalization power that will be used with strain data to estimate the bulk modulus of the solid and fluid and Poisson's ratio by assuming permeability is available from transient pressure well testing or other independent sources. The prediction and measurement uncertainties were also included in the solution process, leading to a distribution of the estimated parameters. The method was validated using (1) datasets from an idealized example created with a poroelastic simulator, and (2) field data measured at the North Avant Field during a recovery test conducted in a 530‐m reservoir.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70284
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strain Type‐Curve Analysis During Recovery Using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression for Evaluating Confined Reservoir Properties

Soheil Roudini, Scott Scott DeWolf, Lawrence C. Murdoch
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Strain Type‐Curve Analysis During Recovery Using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression for Evaluating Confined Reservoir Properties

Soheil Roudini, Scott Scott DeWolf, Lawrence C. Murdoch
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pressure changes in reservoirs lead to strain in the overlying confining unit, which can be measured near the ground surface using high‐precision strainmeters. We propose a methodology that adapts the classic Agarwal type curves used for analyzing recovery pressure data to interpret strain data. Poroelastic analyses indicate that plotting components of the strain tensor as a function of Agarwal time creates semi‐log straight lines. The average horizontal and vertical strains intersect the zero‐strain axis at times that are similar to the times determined using a similar analysis of the pressure. The intersection time gives a direct estimate of the hydraulic diffusivity. The relationship between the transformational strain and reservoir permeability, specific storage and porosity‐to‐fluid compressibility ratio was established using an Evolutionary Polynomial Regression (EPR) model. The model was trained and validated for different scenarios with the outlined reservoir parameters as inputs and simulated transformational strain as outputs. The result is an accurate model with good generalization power that will be used with strain data to estimate the bulk modulus of the solid and fluid and Poisson's ratio by assuming permeability is available from transient pressure well testing or other independent sources. The prediction and measurement uncertainties were also included in the solution process, leading to a distribution of the estimated parameters. The method was validated using (1) datasets from an idealized example created with a poroelastic simulator, and (2) field data measured at the North Avant Field during a recovery test conducted in a 530‐m reservoir.

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.