AestheFill® in Aesthetic Medicine: From Materials Science to Clinical Practice

ABSTRACT Background Injectable poly‐D, l ‐lactic acid (PDLLA; AestheFill®) is a collagen‐stimulating biostimulator increasingly used for facial rejuvenation and skin‐quality improvement. AestheFill® consists of porous PDLLA microspheres suspended in sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), a formulation that influences handling, early volumization, and tissue integration. Objective To summarize the composition, mechanisms, reconstitution/dilution methods, clinical efficacy and safety, complication prevention/management, and practical comparisons relevant to AestheFill®. Methods Narrative review of preclinical studies, clinical trials, case reports, and consensus/guideline publications addressing AestheFill® properties, in vivo tissue responses, clinical outcomes, and adverse‐event management, informed by structured database searching and reference‐list screening, with emphasis on clinically actionable preparation and injection protocols. Results Preclinical evidence shows localized persistence of PDLLA microspheres at the intended plane with progressive cellular infiltration and type I collagen deposition, supporting a scaffold‐to‐tissue replacement mechanism. Randomized evaluator‐blinded comparative trials in South Korea and China demonstrate noninferior nasolabial fold correction versus hyaluronic acid comparators with favorable short‐ and long‐term safety. Outcomes are technique‐dependent: initial reconstitution should use sterile water for injection to ensure complete CMC hydration; suspension thickness should be selected according to injection plane; and injections should be delivered as small, evenly distributed aliquots to reduce maldistribution‐related nodules. Accelerated reconstitution techniques (back‐and‐forth and vacuum‐assisted hydration variants) improve workflow and suspension homogeneity. Recent guidance emphasizes ultrasonography‐assisted diagnosis and staged management for AestheFill® nodules. Rarely, vascular occlusion may cause severe ocular or neurologic sequelae. Conclusions Available evidence supports injectable PDLLA as a collagen‐stimulating filler when reconstitution and anatomy‐driven technique are standardized; further comparative trials and standardized outcomes are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatological Reviews
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/der2.70068
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AestheFill® in Aesthetic Medicine: From Materials Science to Clinical Practice

Chuan‐Yuan Lin, Jui‐Yu Lin
Dermatological Reviews
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

AestheFill® in Aesthetic Medicine: From Materials Science to Clinical Practice

Chuan‐Yuan Lin, Jui‐Yu Lin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Injectable poly‐D, l ‐lactic acid (PDLLA; AestheFill®) is a collagen‐stimulating biostimulator increasingly used for facial rejuvenation and skin‐quality improvement. AestheFill® consists of porous PDLLA microspheres suspended in sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), a formulation that influences handling, early volumization, and tissue integration. Objective To summarize the composition, mechanisms, reconstitution/dilution methods, clinical efficacy and safety, complication prevention/management, and practical comparisons relevant to AestheFill®. Methods Narrative review of preclinical studies, clinical trials, case reports, and consensus/guideline publications addressing AestheFill® properties, in vivo tissue responses, clinical outcomes, and adverse‐event management, informed by structured database searching and reference‐list screening, with emphasis on clinically actionable preparation and injection protocols. Results Preclinical evidence shows localized persistence of PDLLA microspheres at the intended plane with progressive cellular infiltration and type I collagen deposition, supporting a scaffold‐to‐tissue replacement mechanism. Randomized evaluator‐blinded comparative trials in South Korea and China demonstrate noninferior nasolabial fold correction versus hyaluronic acid comparators with favorable short‐ and long‐term safety. Outcomes are technique‐dependent: initial reconstitution should use sterile water for injection to ensure complete CMC hydration; suspension thickness should be selected according to injection plane; and injections should be delivered as small, evenly distributed aliquots to reduce maldistribution‐related nodules. Accelerated reconstitution techniques (back‐and‐forth and vacuum‐assisted hydration variants) improve workflow and suspension homogeneity. Recent guidance emphasizes ultrasonography‐assisted diagnosis and staged management for AestheFill® nodules. Rarely, vascular occlusion may cause severe ocular or neurologic sequelae. Conclusions Available evidence supports injectable PDLLA as a collagen‐stimulating filler when reconstitution and anatomy‐driven technique are standardized; further comparative trials and standardized outcomes are needed.

Dermatological ReviewsVol. 7(2)
National University of Kaohsiung (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.