Deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing university student experiences with earthquake early warning in the United States: Evaluating language planning and technology access

The growing literature on deaf and hard of hearing (DHH+) populations and disasters demonstrates that emergency communication (including alerts) is not reaching global DHH+ individuals with dangerous impacts for morbidity and mortality. This is the first research study in the U.S. to qualitatively explore the experiences of DHH+ persons with earthquake early warning (EEW) through group-based dialogue sessions. The study investigates eight DHH+ university students’past earthquake experiences, access to EEW alerts, and perceptions of ShakeAlert Ⓡ , an EEW system for detecting earthquakes and alerting residents of California, Oregon, and Washington. Findings highlight key gaps in disaster alert usability within four thematic areas: lack of messaging in participants’ language(s), unclear alert messaging, deficient message delivery mechanisms for deafblind persons, and insufficient access to earthquake information and training that leads to dependence on informal information networks. Weaknesses identified in these four themes reduce DHH+ trust in EEW systems and compromise the capacity of alert recipients to take swift protective action or to mentally prepare before shaking starts. The study also underscores structural factors such as insufficient linguistic representation in disaster language planning and technology design, which ignores the linguistic and sensory access needs of DHH+ individuals. Building on disaster language planning frameworks, we recommend involving DHH+ populations to co-develop EEW alerts. By centering DHH+ perspectives, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to ensure that EEW systems reach everyone. • First study on DHH+ student experiences with earthquake early warning. • Identifies four gaps impacting EEW usability and trust related to message design and delivery. • Finds that technology innovation does not guarantee access, especially for those for whom English is not their primary language • Recommends engaging DHH+ stakeholders in developing/evaluating EEW alerts and user interfaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2026.106095
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing university student experiences with earthquake early warning in the United States: Evaluating language planning and technology access

Oronde Drakes, D. F. Sumy, Michele Cooke, Audrey C. Cooper et al.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Deaf, deafblind, and hard of hearing university student experiences with earthquake early warning in the United States: Evaluating language planning and technology access

Oronde Drakes, D. F. Sumy, Michele Cooke, Audrey C. Cooper, Kota Takayama, Sara K. McBride
article en

Abstract

The growing literature on deaf and hard of hearing (DHH+) populations and disasters demonstrates that emergency communication (including alerts) is not reaching global DHH+ individuals with dangerous impacts for morbidity and mortality. This is the first research study in the U.S. to qualitatively explore the experiences of DHH+ persons with earthquake early warning (EEW) through group-based dialogue sessions. The study investigates eight DHH+ university students’past earthquake experiences, access to EEW alerts, and perceptions of ShakeAlert Ⓡ , an EEW system for detecting earthquakes and alerting residents of California, Oregon, and Washington. Findings highlight key gaps in disaster alert usability within four thematic areas: lack of messaging in participants’ language(s), unclear alert messaging, deficient message delivery mechanisms for deafblind persons, and insufficient access to earthquake information and training that leads to dependence on informal information networks. Weaknesses identified in these four themes reduce DHH+ trust in EEW systems and compromise the capacity of alert recipients to take swift protective action or to mentally prepare before shaking starts. The study also underscores structural factors such as insufficient linguistic representation in disaster language planning and technology design, which ignores the linguistic and sensory access needs of DHH+ individuals. Building on disaster language planning frameworks, we recommend involving DHH+ populations to co-develop EEW alerts. By centering DHH+ perspectives, this research contributes to ongoing efforts to ensure that EEW systems reach everyone. • First study on DHH+ student experiences with earthquake early warning. • Identifies four gaps impacting EEW usability and trust related to message design and delivery. • Finds that technology innovation does not guarantee access, especially for those for whom English is not their primary language • Recommends engaging DHH+ stakeholders in developing/evaluating EEW alerts and user interfaces.

International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionVol. 137
United States Geological Survey (US), U.S. National Science Foundation (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Gallaudet University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.