Optimisation and 4E analysis of hybrid indirect solar electric dryer (HISED) for bitter gourd drying

• Hybrid Indirect Solar Electric Dryer (HISED) with ETSC optimized for bitter gourd. • RSM-BBD used to analyse effects of air velocity, mass, and slice geometry. • Achieved 13.9% final moisture, 3.98 kWh energy consumption, and 76.4% shrinkage factor. • System reached 70.25% thermal and 6% exergy efficiency with strong model fit. • Economic analysis showed 85-month EPBP and 1,126 kg CO 2 reduction per year. This study evaluates a Hybrid Indirect Solar Electric Dryer (HISED) integrated with an evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) for optimising the drying of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) slices. A Box-Behnken Design (BBD) combined with Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is applied to analyse the effects of air velocity, product mass and slice geometry on key drying parameters: moisture content (MC), energy consumption (EC) and shrinkage factor (SF). Optimal conditions are achieved at an air velocity of 0.286 m/s, product mass of 2 kg, and circular geometry, resulting in 13.9% final moisture (dry basis), 3.98 kWh energy consumption and a shrinkage factor of 76.4%. Model predictions closely matched experimental values, with errors below 10% and R 2 values exceeding 0.97. The HISED-ETSC system produced outlet air temperatures of 59–63 °C and drying chamber temperatures of 85–97 °C. Across 15 trials, blower power ranged from 2.1–3.1 kW, while the air preheater required 12–20 kW. The system achieved a thermal efficiency of 70.25%, with electrical efficiency between 5.9 and 12.5% and exergy efficiency of 6%. Among tested drying models, the Midilli–Kucuk model provided the best fit, yielding R 2 = 0.9965, RMSE = 0.449, χ 2 = 0.302 and MAE = 0.372. Economic and environmental analysis showed an Energy Payback Period (EPBP) of 85 months, annual savings of $203.76 and CO 2 reduction of 1,126.08 kg/year, with a total embodied energy of 972 kWh.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101742
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimisation and 4E analysis of hybrid indirect solar electric dryer (HISED) for bitter gourd drying

Manjula Devi Murugesan, Joseph Daniel
Energy Conversion and Management X
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Optimisation and 4E analysis of hybrid indirect solar electric dryer (HISED) for bitter gourd drying

Manjula Devi Murugesan, Joseph Daniel
article en

Abstract

• Hybrid Indirect Solar Electric Dryer (HISED) with ETSC optimized for bitter gourd. • RSM-BBD used to analyse effects of air velocity, mass, and slice geometry. • Achieved 13.9% final moisture, 3.98 kWh energy consumption, and 76.4% shrinkage factor. • System reached 70.25% thermal and 6% exergy efficiency with strong model fit. • Economic analysis showed 85-month EPBP and 1,126 kg CO 2 reduction per year. This study evaluates a Hybrid Indirect Solar Electric Dryer (HISED) integrated with an evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) for optimising the drying of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) slices. A Box-Behnken Design (BBD) combined with Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is applied to analyse the effects of air velocity, product mass and slice geometry on key drying parameters: moisture content (MC), energy consumption (EC) and shrinkage factor (SF). Optimal conditions are achieved at an air velocity of 0.286 m/s, product mass of 2 kg, and circular geometry, resulting in 13.9% final moisture (dry basis), 3.98 kWh energy consumption and a shrinkage factor of 76.4%. Model predictions closely matched experimental values, with errors below 10% and R 2 values exceeding 0.97. The HISED-ETSC system produced outlet air temperatures of 59–63 °C and drying chamber temperatures of 85–97 °C. Across 15 trials, blower power ranged from 2.1–3.1 kW, while the air preheater required 12–20 kW. The system achieved a thermal efficiency of 70.25%, with electrical efficiency between 5.9 and 12.5% and exergy efficiency of 6%. Among tested drying models, the Midilli–Kucuk model provided the best fit, yielding R 2 = 0.9965, RMSE = 0.449, χ 2 = 0.302 and MAE = 0.372. Economic and environmental analysis showed an Energy Payback Period (EPBP) of 85 months, annual savings of $203.76 and CO 2 reduction of 1,126.08 kg/year, with a total embodied energy of 972 kWh.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 30
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.