Comparative Study of Synthetic and Bio‐Based Adsorbents for Vanadium Recovery: α‐Aminophosphonate versus Magnetic Cysteine‐Functionalized Chitosan

ABSTRACT A considerable increase in the global importance of vanadium and its extensive use in alloy manufacturing has stimulated growing interest in its extraction and recovery. In this study, a magnetic chitosan functionalized with cysteine moieties (MCC) and a synthetic α‐aminophosphonate (o‐phenylenediamine‐based adsorbent, OPDA) were prepared and evaluated as adsorbents for vanadium ions from sulfate media. The prepared bio‐ and synthetic adsorbents were characterized using FT‐IR, TGA, BET surface area, pH PZC , XRD, elemental analysis, and SEM–EDX techniques. Optimization of sorption parameters indicated that the highest vanadium uptake was achieved at pH 4.0 for MCC and 2.0 for OPDA, with contact times of 120 and 90 min, an adsorbent dosage of 0.01 g, and an initial vanadium concentration of 150 mg L −1 , respectively. The adsorption process followed the Langmuir isotherm model, with maximum experimental adsorption capacities of 90 mg g −1 for MCC and 70 mg g −1 for OPDA, in good agreement with calculated values. Thermodynamic parameters confirmed the spontaneous and exothermic nature of the adsorption process. Application of MCC and OPDA to a real residue liquor obtained from ferruginous gibbsite‐bearing shale (Um Bogma Formation, Abu Thor locality, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt) resulted in vanadium removal uptakes of 70 and 50 mg g −1 , respectively, demonstrating the practical applicability of the prepared adsorbents for technological and industrial purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistrySelect
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202506060
Primary Topic
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Synthetic and Bio‐Based Adsorbents for Vanadium Recovery: α‐Aminophosphonate versus Magnetic Cysteine‐Functionalized Chitosan

Amal E. Mubark, Basma T. Mohamed, Marwa M. Rashad
ChemistrySelect
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
article

Comparative Study of Synthetic and Bio‐Based Adsorbents for Vanadium Recovery: α‐Aminophosphonate versus Magnetic Cysteine‐Functionalized Chitosan

Amal E. Mubark, Basma T. Mohamed, Marwa M. Rashad
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT A considerable increase in the global importance of vanadium and its extensive use in alloy manufacturing has stimulated growing interest in its extraction and recovery. In this study, a magnetic chitosan functionalized with cysteine moieties (MCC) and a synthetic α‐aminophosphonate (o‐phenylenediamine‐based adsorbent, OPDA) were prepared and evaluated as adsorbents for vanadium ions from sulfate media. The prepared bio‐ and synthetic adsorbents were characterized using FT‐IR, TGA, BET surface area, pH PZC , XRD, elemental analysis, and SEM–EDX techniques. Optimization of sorption parameters indicated that the highest vanadium uptake was achieved at pH 4.0 for MCC and 2.0 for OPDA, with contact times of 120 and 90 min, an adsorbent dosage of 0.01 g, and an initial vanadium concentration of 150 mg L −1 , respectively. The adsorption process followed the Langmuir isotherm model, with maximum experimental adsorption capacities of 90 mg g −1 for MCC and 70 mg g −1 for OPDA, in good agreement with calculated values. Thermodynamic parameters confirmed the spontaneous and exothermic nature of the adsorption process. Application of MCC and OPDA to a real residue liquor obtained from ferruginous gibbsite‐bearing shale (Um Bogma Formation, Abu Thor locality, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt) resulted in vanadium removal uptakes of 70 and 50 mg g −1 , respectively, demonstrating the practical applicability of the prepared adsorbents for technological and industrial purposes.

ChemistrySelectVol. 11(9)
Nuclear Materials Authority (EG)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.