The paradox of inequality that isn’t: rising economic inequality depresses and polarizes citizens’ belief in meritocracy

Abstract This study examines how rising income inequality has been impacting individuals’ belief in merit-based success, using three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies. Challenging the seminal finding of a “paradox of inequality,” we find no evidence of a positive effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries. Instead, we identify a substantively moderate but robustly negative effect of inequality on perceptions of meritocracy from within-country changes over time: as inequality rises, citizens’ belief in meritocracy declines. We further uncover that inequality does not merely induce a mean shift, but affects the shape of the distribution of meritocracy beliefs insofar as we find the proportion of skeptical perceptions of meritocratic realities to be increasing with higher levels of inequality. Our findings thus suggest that growing inequality undermines citizens’ trust in procedural fairness and contributes to an increased polarization of attitudes and beliefs at the heart of open societies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Socio-Economic Review
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwag016
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradox of inequality that isn’t: rising economic inequality depresses and polarizes citizens’ belief in meritocracy

Markus Gangl, Sven Ehmes
1 citations
Socio-Economic Review
Social Capital and Networks
55.57
article

The paradox of inequality that isn’t: rising economic inequality depresses and polarizes citizens’ belief in meritocracy

Markus Gangl, Sven Ehmes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how rising income inequality has been impacting individuals’ belief in merit-based success, using three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies. Challenging the seminal finding of a “paradox of inequality,” we find no evidence of a positive effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries. Instead, we identify a substantively moderate but robustly negative effect of inequality on perceptions of meritocracy from within-country changes over time: as inequality rises, citizens’ belief in meritocracy declines. We further uncover that inequality does not merely induce a mean shift, but affects the shape of the distribution of meritocracy beliefs insofar as we find the proportion of skeptical perceptions of meritocratic realities to be increasing with higher levels of inequality. Our findings thus suggest that growing inequality undermines citizens’ trust in procedural fairness and contributes to an increased polarization of attitudes and beliefs at the heart of open societies.

Socio-Economic Review
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Heidelberg University (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Social Capital and Networks
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The paradox of inequality that isn’t: rising economic inequality depresses and polarizes citizens’ belief in meritocracy — Markus Gangl, Sven Ehmes · Socio-Economic Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS