From Expansion to Erosion: The Global Trajectory of Judicial Independence, 1960–2018

ABSTRACT Judicial independence expanded globally throughout the twentieth century, but this trajectory has recently come under pressure. In recent years, governments around the world have increasingly challenged judicial autonomy. This study unpacks this global reversal by analyzing data from 156 states between 1960 and 2018. Drawing on world society theory and related scholarship, I use panel regression models to examine how domestic conditions and states' memberships in liberal and illiberal international organizations are associated with judicial independence. The findings reveal a growing divide: While states embedded in liberal world society tend to maintain higher levels of judicial independence, those aligned with illiberal international organizations show signs of erosion—particularly during the postliberal period since 2008. I conclude by arguing that attention should focus not only on the widening gap between liberal and illiberal alignments but also on the emerging entanglements and erosion of liberal norms themselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Forum
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.70062
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Expansion to Erosion: The Global Trajectory of Judicial Independence, 1960–2018

Nir Rotem
Sociological Forum
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

From Expansion to Erosion: The Global Trajectory of Judicial Independence, 1960–2018

Nir Rotem
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Judicial independence expanded globally throughout the twentieth century, but this trajectory has recently come under pressure. In recent years, governments around the world have increasingly challenged judicial autonomy. This study unpacks this global reversal by analyzing data from 156 states between 1960 and 2018. Drawing on world society theory and related scholarship, I use panel regression models to examine how domestic conditions and states' memberships in liberal and illiberal international organizations are associated with judicial independence. The findings reveal a growing divide: While states embedded in liberal world society tend to maintain higher levels of judicial independence, those aligned with illiberal international organizations show signs of erosion—particularly during the postliberal period since 2008. I conclude by arguing that attention should focus not only on the widening gap between liberal and illiberal alignments but also on the emerging entanglements and erosion of liberal norms themselves.

Sociological Forum
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Expansion to Erosion: The Global Trajectory of Judicial Independence, 1960–2018 — Nir Rotem · Sociological Forum (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS