Specialist Affordability and Access for People With Disability

ABSTRACT Introduction Equitable access to care is a core principle of Medicare and Australia's broader health policy frameworks, yet access to specialist care remains marked by persistent inequities. People with disability experience longer waits, face greater affordability pressures due to lower incomes and encounter greater administrative burden. These disparities undermine progress towards Australia's commitments to equitable and accessible healthcare set out in national and international policy agreements. Addressing them requires understanding the structural barriers that shape specialist access. Methods This article synthesises evidence on inequities in specialist access and fees for people with disability and identifies policy settings that shape these outcomes. It draws on existing literature, policy documents, and emerging evidence from linked administrative data, including the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA). Results Key barriers include the geographic distribution of specialists, wide variation in out‐of‐pocket fees, fragmented referral pathways and limited care coordination, which may contribute to delayed or foregone care. These inequities are exacerbated by gaps in monitoring healthcare system performance. Australia has no system for tracking specialist wait times, limiting policymakers’ ability to identify disparities. Advances in linked administrative data, particularly PLIDA, provide a foundation for improved monitoring. Conclusion Improved wait time monitoring, greater fee transparency, targeted incentives for equitable care and strengthened navigation support are needed to improve access to specialist care for people with disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Economic Review
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.70043
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specialist Affordability and Access for People With Disability

Jodie Bailie, Karinna Saxby, Dennis Petrie, Samia Badji et al.
Australian Economic Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Specialist Affordability and Access for People With Disability

Jodie Bailie, Karinna Saxby, Dennis Petrie, Samia Badji, Gozde Bumin Aydin, Ryan Liang, James Taylor
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Equitable access to care is a core principle of Medicare and Australia's broader health policy frameworks, yet access to specialist care remains marked by persistent inequities. People with disability experience longer waits, face greater affordability pressures due to lower incomes and encounter greater administrative burden. These disparities undermine progress towards Australia's commitments to equitable and accessible healthcare set out in national and international policy agreements. Addressing them requires understanding the structural barriers that shape specialist access. Methods This article synthesises evidence on inequities in specialist access and fees for people with disability and identifies policy settings that shape these outcomes. It draws on existing literature, policy documents, and emerging evidence from linked administrative data, including the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA). Results Key barriers include the geographic distribution of specialists, wide variation in out‐of‐pocket fees, fragmented referral pathways and limited care coordination, which may contribute to delayed or foregone care. These inequities are exacerbated by gaps in monitoring healthcare system performance. Australia has no system for tracking specialist wait times, limiting policymakers’ ability to identify disparities. Advances in linked administrative data, particularly PLIDA, provide a foundation for improved monitoring. Conclusion Improved wait time monitoring, greater fee transparency, targeted incentives for equitable care and strengthened navigation support are needed to improve access to specialist care for people with disability.

Australian Economic ReviewVol. 59(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Monash University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.