Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile

The barrier effect refers to the difficulties experienced by pedestrians in their movements due to transport infrastructures or high traffic volumes and speeds ( physical barriers ), and the consequent creation of unpleasant environments surrounding these infrastructures due to factors such as noise, air pollution and fear of crime ( environmental barriers ). Few studies have addressed environmental barriers or employed indices to measure both physical and environmental barriers. In this cross-sectional study, we used a questionnaire to collect data in Santiago Province, Chile. The main components associated with residents’ perceptions of the barrier effect were determined using factor analysis. Cluster analysis was then applied to develop barrier effect indices based on the factor scores. Finally, we used logistic regression models to estimate relationships between these indices, the choice of active modes, and the frequency of interactions with neighbours. The sample comprised 1812 valid responses. Our findings indicated that perceptions of the barrier effect can be explained by two components: perceptions of vehicular traffic and crossing points (physical barriers) and perceptions of the surroundings of transport infrastructures (environmental barriers). Travelling to local destinations by active modes was more likely among participants who were carers than among those who were employed. For supermarket trips in particular, participants with basic education were more likely to use active modes than those with a university education. Additionally, perceptions of physical barriers were significantly associated with the use of active modes, whereas neither type of perceived barrier was associated with the frequency of interactions with neighbours. This study shows the importance of integrating the perceptions of pedestrians and cyclists into the planning and design of both new and existing transport infrastructures to improve accessibility. Such an approach is relevant for promoting safe and comfortable environments and encouraging the use of active modes for local activities. • The study examined the barrier effect, travel mode, and interactions with neighbours. • Associations were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. • Carers were more likely than employed people to travel locally by active modes. • Interactions with neighbours were not associated with perceptions of the barrier effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2026.102292
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile

Daniela Vanessa Rodriguez Lara, Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva, Kabir P. Sadarangani, Paulo Anciaes et al.
Journal of Transport & Health
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile

Daniela Vanessa Rodriguez Lara, Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva, Kabir P. Sadarangani, Paulo Anciaes, Jennifer Susan Mindell
article en

Abstract

The barrier effect refers to the difficulties experienced by pedestrians in their movements due to transport infrastructures or high traffic volumes and speeds ( physical barriers ), and the consequent creation of unpleasant environments surrounding these infrastructures due to factors such as noise, air pollution and fear of crime ( environmental barriers ). Few studies have addressed environmental barriers or employed indices to measure both physical and environmental barriers. In this cross-sectional study, we used a questionnaire to collect data in Santiago Province, Chile. The main components associated with residents’ perceptions of the barrier effect were determined using factor analysis. Cluster analysis was then applied to develop barrier effect indices based on the factor scores. Finally, we used logistic regression models to estimate relationships between these indices, the choice of active modes, and the frequency of interactions with neighbours. The sample comprised 1812 valid responses. Our findings indicated that perceptions of the barrier effect can be explained by two components: perceptions of vehicular traffic and crossing points (physical barriers) and perceptions of the surroundings of transport infrastructures (environmental barriers). Travelling to local destinations by active modes was more likely among participants who were carers than among those who were employed. For supermarket trips in particular, participants with basic education were more likely to use active modes than those with a university education. Additionally, perceptions of physical barriers were significantly associated with the use of active modes, whereas neither type of perceived barrier was associated with the frequency of interactions with neighbours. This study shows the importance of integrating the perceptions of pedestrians and cyclists into the planning and design of both new and existing transport infrastructures to improve accessibility. Such an approach is relevant for promoting safe and comfortable environments and encouraging the use of active modes for local activities. • The study examined the barrier effect, travel mode, and interactions with neighbours. • Associations were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. • Carers were more likely than employed people to travel locally by active modes. • Interactions with neighbours were not associated with perceptions of the barrier effect.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 49
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), University College London (GB), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.