Beyond pedagogy: American abstinence-only until marriage sexual education as fundamentalist practice in secular disguise

Abstract The United States has no official federally mandated sexual education curriculum, leaving the existence and content of sexual education to be determined in each individual school system in the country. Unofficially, however, since the passage of the 1981 ‘Chastity Law,’ the preponderance of federal funding has been earmarked for Abstinence-Only Until Marriage sexual education in a manner that treated it as governmental doctrine. Such curricula, at best, emphasize abstinence as the safest option; at worst, they present it as the only option by failing to acknowledge other opinions at all. The predominance of such curricula is of note—and problematically so—because, though rarely acknowledged, they are explicitly fundamentalist. This paper will substantiate the assertion that Abstinence-Only Until Marriage sexual education is a fundamentalist practice, thereby correctly placing it on the secular/sacred continuum and allowing for an honest examination of its appropriateness for use within public education institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06858-0
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond pedagogy: American abstinence-only until marriage sexual education as fundamentalist practice in secular disguise

Zarah S. Robinson
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

Beyond pedagogy: American abstinence-only until marriage sexual education as fundamentalist practice in secular disguise

Zarah S. Robinson
article en

Abstract

Abstract The United States has no official federally mandated sexual education curriculum, leaving the existence and content of sexual education to be determined in each individual school system in the country. Unofficially, however, since the passage of the 1981 ‘Chastity Law,’ the preponderance of federal funding has been earmarked for Abstinence-Only Until Marriage sexual education in a manner that treated it as governmental doctrine. Such curricula, at best, emphasize abstinence as the safest option; at worst, they present it as the only option by failing to acknowledge other opinions at all. The predominance of such curricula is of note—and problematically so—because, though rarely acknowledged, they are explicitly fundamentalist. This paper will substantiate the assertion that Abstinence-Only Until Marriage sexual education is a fundamentalist practice, thereby correctly placing it on the secular/sacred continuum and allowing for an honest examination of its appropriateness for use within public education institutions.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Saint Louis University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond pedagogy: American abstinence-only until marriage sexual education as fundamentalist practice in secular disguise — Zarah S. Robinson · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS