Australia's Specialist Fee Failure: Three Principles for a Way Forward

ABSTRACT Background Setting Medicare Schedule Fees for specialist services in Australia is a pressing challenge. As specialist charges increasingly exceed government rebates, rising out‐of‐pocket costs threaten the core objective of universal health care. Objective To define a fair fee structure that balances equitable compensation for highly trained professionals with affordable access for patients. To ensure that this balance is guided by three principles: sustainability (reflecting training and resource costs), quality (incentivizing high‐quality care) and accessibility (remains affordable and accessible for all patients). Methods This analysis evaluates the current system against three guiding principles: sustainability, quality and accessibility. We present criteria for assessing how well each principle is satisfied and discuss what specialist fees might look like if Australia followed each principle. Findings Australia's current system fails to meet all three principles. Recommendations We propose a three‐pillar reform strategy: 1. Regulated pricing : Set fair Medicare Schedule Fees and limit rebates to specialists who adhere to these fee standards. 2. Transparency : Mandate public reporting of specialists’ fees, quality indicators and waiting times. 3. Increase public capacity : Expand public sector capacity and general practitioner support to reduce reliance on private specialist care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Economic Review
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.70045
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australia's Specialist Fee Failure: Three Principles for a Way Forward

Yuting Zhang, Charles C. Kemp, Stephen Duckett
Australian Economic Review
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Australia's Specialist Fee Failure: Three Principles for a Way Forward

Yuting Zhang, Charles C. Kemp, Stephen Duckett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Setting Medicare Schedule Fees for specialist services in Australia is a pressing challenge. As specialist charges increasingly exceed government rebates, rising out‐of‐pocket costs threaten the core objective of universal health care. Objective To define a fair fee structure that balances equitable compensation for highly trained professionals with affordable access for patients. To ensure that this balance is guided by three principles: sustainability (reflecting training and resource costs), quality (incentivizing high‐quality care) and accessibility (remains affordable and accessible for all patients). Methods This analysis evaluates the current system against three guiding principles: sustainability, quality and accessibility. We present criteria for assessing how well each principle is satisfied and discuss what specialist fees might look like if Australia followed each principle. Findings Australia's current system fails to meet all three principles. Recommendations We propose a three‐pillar reform strategy: 1. Regulated pricing : Set fair Medicare Schedule Fees and limit rebates to specialists who adhere to these fee standards. 2. Transparency : Mandate public reporting of specialists’ fees, quality indicators and waiting times. 3. Increase public capacity : Expand public sector capacity and general practitioner support to reduce reliance on private specialist care.

Australian Economic ReviewVol. 59(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Australian Psychological Society (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.