Turkey's Relations with Gulf States: Temporary Shift or Permanent Alignment?

Abstract In July 2023, despite more than a decade of enmity, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan secured a string of multibillion‐dollar deals with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. What explains the abrupt thaw, and is this a durable realignment or a temporary detour? This article contends that interstate relations are shaped primarily by identity. In the early 2000s, Turkey abandoned its secular tradition and embraced political Islam. During the Arab Spring, this ideology led it to build links to the Muslim Brotherhood—a group that Saudi Arabia and the UAE saw as a threat to regime stability. Despite the political and economic risks, the analysis shows, Ankara's behavior was driven by its identity. The article compares the period of conflict to the post‐2020 opening between Turkey and the Gulf states. While economic interests have become more salient, resulting in cooperation, the findings indicate that the underlying ideological differences persist. Reconciliation is therefore likely to be reversible, not enduring. This article is part of a series on Turkey‐Gulf relations, guest edited by Hamdullah Baycar and Betul Dogan‐Akkas, based on the Gulf Studies Symposium organized by the Gulf International Forum, April 11–12, 2025, at Georgetown University in Washington.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Policy
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.70052
Primary Topic
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkey's Relations with Gulf States: Temporary Shift or Permanent Alignment?

Engin Koc
Middle East Policy
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
article

Turkey's Relations with Gulf States: Temporary Shift or Permanent Alignment?

Engin Koc
article en

Abstract

Abstract In July 2023, despite more than a decade of enmity, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan secured a string of multibillion‐dollar deals with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. What explains the abrupt thaw, and is this a durable realignment or a temporary detour? This article contends that interstate relations are shaped primarily by identity. In the early 2000s, Turkey abandoned its secular tradition and embraced political Islam. During the Arab Spring, this ideology led it to build links to the Muslim Brotherhood—a group that Saudi Arabia and the UAE saw as a threat to regime stability. Despite the political and economic risks, the analysis shows, Ankara's behavior was driven by its identity. The article compares the period of conflict to the post‐2020 opening between Turkey and the Gulf states. While economic interests have become more salient, resulting in cooperation, the findings indicate that the underlying ideological differences persist. Reconciliation is therefore likely to be reversible, not enduring. This article is part of a series on Turkey‐Gulf relations, guest edited by Hamdullah Baycar and Betul Dogan‐Akkas, based on the Gulf Studies Symposium organized by the Gulf International Forum, April 11–12, 2025, at Georgetown University in Washington.

Middle East Policy
Bursa Technical University (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.