Obinutuzumab Versus Rituximab for the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background:</b> The benefit of specific B cell-targeted therapy in primary membranous nephropathy has been consistently demonstrated and is part of guideline-directed therapy. Though effective, Rituximab displays a highly variable response rate possibly owing to incomplete peripheral B cell depletion. Obinutuzumab is a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody which offers greater sustained peripheral B cell depletion and thus may result in improved clinical effect. This meta-analysis compares clinical efficacy of Obinutuzumab with Rituximab for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted on 10 October 2025. The search identified all studies which directly compared results of Obinutuzumab with Rituximab in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool. Data extraction and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.1 software, assessing heterogeneity with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. <b>Results:</b> Ultimately, three retrospective studies including a total of 161 participants were analyzed. The pooled estimated odds ratio for total clinical remission at 6 months was 2.84 (95% CI [1.42-5.69], <i>p</i> = 0.003, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and at 12 months was 12.25 ([95% CI 2.67-56.28]), <i>p</i> = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for complete clinical remission at 6 months was 1.78 (95% CI [0.25-12.63], <i>p</i> = 0.57, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) at 12 months was 4.12 (95% CI [1.36-12.48], <i>p</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for immunologic remission at 6 months was 6.18 (95% CI [1.57-24.39], <i>p</i> = 0.009, I<sup>2</sup> = 58%), and at 12 months was 5.56 (95% CI [1.50-20.64], <i>p</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for peripheral B cell depletion at 6 months was 3.91 (95% CI [0.99-15.40], <i>p</i> = 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 25%). <b>Discussion:</b> Obinutuzumab signals improvement in clinically relevant end points when compared with Rituximab for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy but will require confirmation with head-to-head prospective data. The main limitations of this study include small sample sizes, geographic restriction, and retrospective design of the studies resulting in reduced generalizability. <b>Other:</b> There was no funding for this study. This review has been registered with PROSPERO (ID 1218735).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16030434
Primary Topic
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obinutuzumab Versus Rituximab for the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Padideh Daneii, Andrew Lurie, Sana Khan, Heena Mansuri et al.
Life
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
article

Obinutuzumab Versus Rituximab for the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Padideh Daneii, Andrew Lurie, Sana Khan, Heena Mansuri, Zoya Khan, Anas Bizanti
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The benefit of specific B cell-targeted therapy in primary membranous nephropathy has been consistently demonstrated and is part of guideline-directed therapy. Though effective, Rituximab displays a highly variable response rate possibly owing to incomplete peripheral B cell depletion. Obinutuzumab is a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody which offers greater sustained peripheral B cell depletion and thus may result in improved clinical effect. This meta-analysis compares clinical efficacy of Obinutuzumab with Rituximab for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted on 10 October 2025. The search identified all studies which directly compared results of Obinutuzumab with Rituximab in the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool. Data extraction and statistical analysis were performed using RevMan 5.1 software, assessing heterogeneity with the I<sup>2</sup> statistic. <b>Results:</b> Ultimately, three retrospective studies including a total of 161 participants were analyzed. The pooled estimated odds ratio for total clinical remission at 6 months was 2.84 (95% CI [1.42-5.69], <i>p</i> = 0.003, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), and at 12 months was 12.25 ([95% CI 2.67-56.28]), <i>p</i> = 0.001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for complete clinical remission at 6 months was 1.78 (95% CI [0.25-12.63], <i>p</i> = 0.57, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) at 12 months was 4.12 (95% CI [1.36-12.48], <i>p</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for immunologic remission at 6 months was 6.18 (95% CI [1.57-24.39], <i>p</i> = 0.009, I<sup>2</sup> = 58%), and at 12 months was 5.56 (95% CI [1.50-20.64], <i>p</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The pooled estimated odds ratio for peripheral B cell depletion at 6 months was 3.91 (95% CI [0.99-15.40], <i>p</i> = 0.05, I<sup>2</sup> = 25%). <b>Discussion:</b> Obinutuzumab signals improvement in clinically relevant end points when compared with Rituximab for the treatment of primary membranous nephropathy but will require confirmation with head-to-head prospective data. The main limitations of this study include small sample sizes, geographic restriction, and retrospective design of the studies resulting in reduced generalizability. <b>Other:</b> There was no funding for this study. This review has been registered with PROSPERO (ID 1218735).

LifeVol. 16(3)
Lakeland Regional Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.