Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment

Abstract This paper presents a non‐price‐based conservation experiment performed among 6723 college dorm residents. We analyse the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention delivered through email, featuring one of two types of social‐comparison‐based energy consumption feedback: a quintile social comparison message and a mean comparison message. The quintile social comparison message ranks residents' relative energy consumption in quintiles, while the mean comparison message compares their consumption to the average. Our results show that the relative effectiveness of these messages depends on residents' baseline consumption patterns. Users in the higher quintiles (fourth and fifth) are more likely to reduce their energy consumption, while those in the lower quintiles (first and second) tend to increase their electricity usage after receiving the messages. We also observe that this adjustment towards the median consumption level appears to be more pronounced in single‐ and double‐student rooms compared to multiple‐student rooms. Using a causal forest approach to examine heterogeneity, we find that certain individual traits and physical factors may influence these room dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70038
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment

Tseng Yz, Yating Chuang, J. W. Yang, Eric S. Lin
Economica
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment

Tseng Yz, Yating Chuang, J. W. Yang, Eric S. Lin
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a non‐price‐based conservation experiment performed among 6723 college dorm residents. We analyse the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention delivered through email, featuring one of two types of social‐comparison‐based energy consumption feedback: a quintile social comparison message and a mean comparison message. The quintile social comparison message ranks residents' relative energy consumption in quintiles, while the mean comparison message compares their consumption to the average. Our results show that the relative effectiveness of these messages depends on residents' baseline consumption patterns. Users in the higher quintiles (fourth and fifth) are more likely to reduce their energy consumption, while those in the lower quintiles (first and second) tend to increase their electricity usage after receiving the messages. We also observe that this adjustment towards the median consumption level appears to be more pronounced in single‐ and double‐student rooms compared to multiple‐student rooms. Using a causal forest approach to examine heterogeneity, we find that certain individual traits and physical factors may influence these room dynamics.

Economica
National Chung Hsing University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Academia Sinica (TW), National Taipei University (TW)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social comparison and energy conservation: the role of reference groups and room dynamics in a field experiment — Tseng Yz, Yating Chuang, et al. · Economica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS