Negative Emotional Responses on Social Media During Crisis Events

ABSTRACT Japan's 2023 discharge of nuclear wastewater into the ocean sparked widespread negative emotions on social media, underscoring the mental health impact of a globally salient environmental event. However, empirical evidence remains limited on how controversial environmental risks generate distinct patterns of emotional responses. To address this gap, this study analyzes large‐scale Weibo data from Japan's 2023 wastewater discharge to examine how differentiated negative emotions are shaped by crisis appraisal cues and social media interactions. Posts were classified into three discrete emotions—anxiety, sadness, and anger—using a sentiment lexicon. We then applied Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify thematic contexts. We further used regression analysis to assess the effects of these factors across different emotional outcomes. Results show that attribution‐independent emotions (anxiety and sadness) are primarily driven by cognitive appraisals of the event's danger, damage, and urgency; in contrast, attribution‐dependent anger is amplified by discussions of responsibility and social interactions. Notably, rational communications by influential users significantly mitigate anger levels. By integrating the Social‐Mediated Crisis Communication (SMCC) framework with Cognitive Appraisal Theory, this study elucidates how crisis cognition and social interaction jointly shape emotional dynamics. The findings offer guidance for developing differentiated management strategies for negative emotions in environmental crises, enabling more precise and effective regulation of public sentiment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.70131
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Emotional Responses on Social Media During Crisis Events

Chengyang Fu, Jingfang Liu, Dingyun Lou
Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Negative Emotional Responses on Social Media During Crisis Events

Chengyang Fu, Jingfang Liu, Dingyun Lou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Japan's 2023 discharge of nuclear wastewater into the ocean sparked widespread negative emotions on social media, underscoring the mental health impact of a globally salient environmental event. However, empirical evidence remains limited on how controversial environmental risks generate distinct patterns of emotional responses. To address this gap, this study analyzes large‐scale Weibo data from Japan's 2023 wastewater discharge to examine how differentiated negative emotions are shaped by crisis appraisal cues and social media interactions. Posts were classified into three discrete emotions—anxiety, sadness, and anger—using a sentiment lexicon. We then applied Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify thematic contexts. We further used regression analysis to assess the effects of these factors across different emotional outcomes. Results show that attribution‐independent emotions (anxiety and sadness) are primarily driven by cognitive appraisals of the event's danger, damage, and urgency; in contrast, attribution‐dependent anger is amplified by discussions of responsibility and social interactions. Notably, rational communications by influential users significantly mitigate anger levels. By integrating the Social‐Mediated Crisis Communication (SMCC) framework with Cognitive Appraisal Theory, this study elucidates how crisis cognition and social interaction jointly shape emotional dynamics. The findings offer guidance for developing differentiated management strategies for negative emotions in environmental crises, enabling more precise and effective regulation of public sentiment.

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis ManagementVol. 34(1)
Shanghai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.