Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of HPV-related medical information: a cross-sectional content analysis

Following the 2023 extension of HPV vaccine eligibility (9–45 years) in China, public demand for HPV-related health information has surged, with Bilibili (a long-form knowledge platform) and TikTok (a short-form high-engagement platform) emerging as core sources. This study aimed to compare uploader characteristics, content features, information quality, and the correlation between audience engagement and quality of HPV-related videos on the two platforms. On August 8, 2025, we retrieved the top 100 videos from each platform using three search terms: “HPV vaccine”, “human papillomavirus infection”, and “cervical cancer screening”. Prior to retrieval, user accounts were logged out and browsing histories cleared to avoid personalized recommendation biases, with results displayed in the platforms’ default comprehensive ranking. After excluding irrelevant, duplicate, silent, and advertisement videos (as well as those published < 7 days), 197 valid samples were analyzed. Quality was evaluated via the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Global Quality Score (GQS), and a customized HPV-specific checklist. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 30.0, including nonparametric tests, correlation analysis, and regression models as appropriate. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. TikTok videos were significantly shorter (median: 53s vs. 278s, p < 0.01) and had higher audience engagement (median likes: 6011 vs. 420.5, p < 0.01) than Bilibili videos. Bilibili outperformed TikTok across 11 key quality metrics (e.g., PEMAT-Total: 1.0 vs. 0.84, p < 0.01), with TikTok showing a lack of preventive information (median score = 0) and 32% of non-professional uploaders’ videos on Bilibili failing to clarify HPV 16/18-cervical cancer associations. Audience engagement was positively correlated with quality on Bilibili (r = 0.25–0.31, p < 0.05) but not on TikTok. No significant quality differences were observed between professional and non-professional uploaders on either platform (all p > 0.05). TikTok serves as an effective channel for introductory HPV science communication, while Bilibili is better suited for systematic knowledge acquisition. To enhance public health impact, platforms, creators, and regulators should collaborate: TikTok should establish quality thresholds for short-form health content, and Bilibili should further enhance the depth of professional HPV content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26915-2
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of HPV-related medical information: a cross-sectional content analysis

Yanjiao Hua, Shupei Xu, Li Deng, Zhaohui Jiang et al.
BMC Public Health
Social Media in Health Education
article

Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of HPV-related medical information: a cross-sectional content analysis

Yanjiao Hua, Shupei Xu, Li Deng, Zhaohui Jiang, Mengjie Li
article en

Abstract

Following the 2023 extension of HPV vaccine eligibility (9–45 years) in China, public demand for HPV-related health information has surged, with Bilibili (a long-form knowledge platform) and TikTok (a short-form high-engagement platform) emerging as core sources. This study aimed to compare uploader characteristics, content features, information quality, and the correlation between audience engagement and quality of HPV-related videos on the two platforms. On August 8, 2025, we retrieved the top 100 videos from each platform using three search terms: “HPV vaccine”, “human papillomavirus infection”, and “cervical cancer screening”. Prior to retrieval, user accounts were logged out and browsing histories cleared to avoid personalized recommendation biases, with results displayed in the platforms’ default comprehensive ranking. After excluding irrelevant, duplicate, silent, and advertisement videos (as well as those published < 7 days), 197 valid samples were analyzed. Quality was evaluated via the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Global Quality Score (GQS), and a customized HPV-specific checklist. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 30.0, including nonparametric tests, correlation analysis, and regression models as appropriate. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. TikTok videos were significantly shorter (median: 53s vs. 278s, p < 0.01) and had higher audience engagement (median likes: 6011 vs. 420.5, p < 0.01) than Bilibili videos. Bilibili outperformed TikTok across 11 key quality metrics (e.g., PEMAT-Total: 1.0 vs. 0.84, p < 0.01), with TikTok showing a lack of preventive information (median score = 0) and 32% of non-professional uploaders’ videos on Bilibili failing to clarify HPV 16/18-cervical cancer associations. Audience engagement was positively correlated with quality on Bilibili (r = 0.25–0.31, p < 0.05) but not on TikTok. No significant quality differences were observed between professional and non-professional uploaders on either platform (all p > 0.05). TikTok serves as an effective channel for introductory HPV science communication, while Bilibili is better suited for systematic knowledge acquisition. To enhance public health impact, platforms, creators, and regulators should collaborate: TikTok should establish quality thresholds for short-form health content, and Bilibili should further enhance the depth of professional HPV content.

BMC Public Health
The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.