A hybrid workflow combining the Plus–Minus method and tomography to resolve sharp interfaces in near‐surface seismic refraction

Abstract Near‐surface seismic refraction tomography is a powerful tool for imaging shallow subsurface structures, yet conventional approaches often fail to resolve sharp velocity contrasts at geological interfaces due to inherent smoothness constraints. We present a hybrid methodology that combines Hagedoorn's Plus–Minus ( T ±) method with refraction tomography, constructing geologically plausible 2D starting models with predefined interfaces to overcome these limitations. Validation through synthetic benchmarks and field applications—performed with identical iteration counts and inversion parameters for fair comparison—demonstrates consistent superiority in scenarios involving abrupt velocity transitions (permafrost boundaries, water tables and bedrock interfaces). Synthetic tests show that although conventional tomography fails to recover plausible models for interfaces with significant topography, the hybrid approach accurately resolves both interface geometries and velocity distributions. Field applications confirm these advantages. In a hydrological survey, the method delineated horizontal water tables at 5.2 ± 1.0 m depth versus smooth, non‐physical solutions from conventional tomography. In Alpine permafrost zones, it resolved extreme lateral velocity contrasts (such as 2.1–5.3 km/s at 20 m depth) while maintaining inversion stability. This work establishes a practical and robust workflow for generating geologically constrained starting models directly from refraction data, significantly advancing the resolution of sharp interfaces in near‐surface seismic tomography for both academic and industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Near Surface Geophysics
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.70041
Primary Topic
Seismic Waves and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A hybrid workflow combining the Plus–Minus method and tomography to resolve sharp interfaces in near‐surface seismic refraction

П. А. Дергач, Ivan Koulakov, Filipp Verin
Near Surface Geophysics
Seismic Waves and Analysis
article

A hybrid workflow combining the Plus–Minus method and tomography to resolve sharp interfaces in near‐surface seismic refraction

П. А. Дергач, Ivan Koulakov, Filipp Verin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Near‐surface seismic refraction tomography is a powerful tool for imaging shallow subsurface structures, yet conventional approaches often fail to resolve sharp velocity contrasts at geological interfaces due to inherent smoothness constraints. We present a hybrid methodology that combines Hagedoorn's Plus–Minus ( T ±) method with refraction tomography, constructing geologically plausible 2D starting models with predefined interfaces to overcome these limitations. Validation through synthetic benchmarks and field applications—performed with identical iteration counts and inversion parameters for fair comparison—demonstrates consistent superiority in scenarios involving abrupt velocity transitions (permafrost boundaries, water tables and bedrock interfaces). Synthetic tests show that although conventional tomography fails to recover plausible models for interfaces with significant topography, the hybrid approach accurately resolves both interface geometries and velocity distributions. Field applications confirm these advantages. In a hydrological survey, the method delineated horizontal water tables at 5.2 ± 1.0 m depth versus smooth, non‐physical solutions from conventional tomography. In Alpine permafrost zones, it resolved extreme lateral velocity contrasts (such as 2.1–5.3 km/s at 20 m depth) while maintaining inversion stability. This work establishes a practical and robust workflow for generating geologically constrained starting models directly from refraction data, significantly advancing the resolution of sharp interfaces in near‐surface seismic tomography for both academic and industrial applications.

Near Surface GeophysicsVol. 24(2)
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU), Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Seismic Waves and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.