Identifying Perforated Appendicitis Preoperatively: A Rule-In Risk Stratification Model

BackgroundAccurately predicting perforated appendicitis (PA) preoperatively remains challenging.MethodsWe retrospectively studied appendectomy patients with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis (2022-2023) to identify predictors of perforation. The primary outcome was histopathologically confirmed perforated appendicitis. Bayesian univariate analysis and Bayesian logistic regression were performed to estimate risk probabilities, with frequentist analyses conducted for confirmation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsOf 770 patients with histologically confirmed appendicitis, 155 (20%) had PA. Bayesian univariate analysis demonstrated decisive evidence (BF<sub>10</sub> > 100) for several predictors, with C-reactive protein (CRP) (BF<sub>10</sub> = 251 079), age (BF<sub>10</sub> = 828), and lymphocyte percentage (BF<sub>10</sub> = 352) showing the strongest associations. Multivariate Bayesian modeling identified a parsimonious three-variable model comprising CRP, age, and lymphocyte percentage. This model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.78) with high specificity (95.4%) and modest sensitivity (29%). Frequentist analyses confirmed these findings.ConclusionA predictive model incorporating CRP, age, and lymphocyte percentage provides a highly specific tool for ruling in perforated appendicitis. This approach may aid in prioritizing surgical urgency and optimizing perioperative management. Prospective validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261434243
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Perforated Appendicitis Preoperatively: A Rule-In Risk Stratification Model

Erhan Gok, Edip Akpinar
The American Surgeon
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Identifying Perforated Appendicitis Preoperatively: A Rule-In Risk Stratification Model

Erhan Gok, Edip Akpinar
article en

Abstract

BackgroundAccurately predicting perforated appendicitis (PA) preoperatively remains challenging.MethodsWe retrospectively studied appendectomy patients with histopathologically confirmed acute appendicitis (2022-2023) to identify predictors of perforation. The primary outcome was histopathologically confirmed perforated appendicitis. Bayesian univariate analysis and Bayesian logistic regression were performed to estimate risk probabilities, with frequentist analyses conducted for confirmation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsOf 770 patients with histologically confirmed appendicitis, 155 (20%) had PA. Bayesian univariate analysis demonstrated decisive evidence (BF<sub>10</sub> > 100) for several predictors, with C-reactive protein (CRP) (BF<sub>10</sub> = 251 079), age (BF<sub>10</sub> = 828), and lymphocyte percentage (BF<sub>10</sub> = 352) showing the strongest associations. Multivariate Bayesian modeling identified a parsimonious three-variable model comprising CRP, age, and lymphocyte percentage. This model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.78) with high specificity (95.4%) and modest sensitivity (29%). Frequentist analyses confirmed these findings.ConclusionA predictive model incorporating CRP, age, and lymphocyte percentage provides a highly specific tool for ruling in perforated appendicitis. This approach may aid in prioritizing surgical urgency and optimizing perioperative management. Prospective validation is warranted.

The American Surgeon
Adana Science and Technology University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.