Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Bridging Gaps from Serology to Clinical Practice

Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy precipitated by gluten exposure in genetically predisposed individuals, with a global prevalence of approximately 1%. Though diagnostic workflows incorporate serologic techniques with both histologic and genetic evaluation, each approach carries key pitfalls that contribute to diagnostic inaccuracy. Serology testing is limited by selective immunoglobulin A deficiency and low-titer antibodies, in addition to interlaboratory variability of calibration standards and specimen concentrations. While duodenal biopsy is considered the gold standard for celiac diagnosis, patchy villous atrophy (e.g., ultrashort celiac disease) mimics other enteropathies, and the inherent subjectivity of histologic interpretation can compromise accuracy. Furthermore, celiac predisposition is highly correlated with two human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. However, nearly 30–40% of the general population expresses one of these alleles, thus introducing the risk of overdiagnosis and limiting the practical implications of genetic testing. There exist special celiac presentations, such as seronegative or potential celiac disease, overlap syndromes, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, that introduce additional challenges to diagnostic success. The serologic-histologic discordance and nonspecific symptoms associated with these cases may require divergence from the traditional workflow, as well as supplemental investigations, such as a gluten challenge or breath testing, to confirm a celiac diagnosis. These challenges in celiac diagnosis have driven research into novel biomarkers and molecular assays that can not only enable earlier, more accurate detection but also provide longitudinal disease monitoring. Such markers include intestinal fatty acid-binding proteins, specific microRNA expression, and microbiome signatures that are strongly linked to celiac disease, which may one day serve as adjunctive screening tools to optimize diagnostic yield. This narrative review identifies the key pitfalls in adult celiac disease diagnosis — from pre-analytic serology issues to patchy histology and overinterpretation of HLA — and proposes a guideline-aligned, stepwise algorithm (with emerging biomarkers) to enhance accuracy and reduce missed or delayed cases. Ultimately, continued refinement of a comprehensive, multimodal diagnostic strategy that can integrate with emerging molecular tools is necessary for overcoming the current limitations of individual approaches to celiac diagnosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Translational Gastroenterology
Published
2025-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14218/jtg.2025.00038
Primary Topic
Celiac Disease Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Bridging Gaps from Serology to Clinical Practice

Michael Tadros, Vinit H. Majmudar, Kyle Nguyen-Ngo
Journal of Translational Gastroenterology
Celiac Disease Research and Management
article

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Bridging Gaps from Serology to Clinical Practice

Michael Tadros, Vinit H. Majmudar, Kyle Nguyen-Ngo
article en

Abstract

Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy precipitated by gluten exposure in genetically predisposed individuals, with a global prevalence of approximately 1%. Though diagnostic workflows incorporate serologic techniques with both histologic and genetic evaluation, each approach carries key pitfalls that contribute to diagnostic inaccuracy. Serology testing is limited by selective immunoglobulin A deficiency and low-titer antibodies, in addition to interlaboratory variability of calibration standards and specimen concentrations. While duodenal biopsy is considered the gold standard for celiac diagnosis, patchy villous atrophy (e.g., ultrashort celiac disease) mimics other enteropathies, and the inherent subjectivity of histologic interpretation can compromise accuracy. Furthermore, celiac predisposition is highly correlated with two human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8. However, nearly 30–40% of the general population expresses one of these alleles, thus introducing the risk of overdiagnosis and limiting the practical implications of genetic testing. There exist special celiac presentations, such as seronegative or potential celiac disease, overlap syndromes, and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, that introduce additional challenges to diagnostic success. The serologic-histologic discordance and nonspecific symptoms associated with these cases may require divergence from the traditional workflow, as well as supplemental investigations, such as a gluten challenge or breath testing, to confirm a celiac diagnosis. These challenges in celiac diagnosis have driven research into novel biomarkers and molecular assays that can not only enable earlier, more accurate detection but also provide longitudinal disease monitoring. Such markers include intestinal fatty acid-binding proteins, specific microRNA expression, and microbiome signatures that are strongly linked to celiac disease, which may one day serve as adjunctive screening tools to optimize diagnostic yield. This narrative review identifies the key pitfalls in adult celiac disease diagnosis — from pre-analytic serology issues to patchy histology and overinterpretation of HLA — and proposes a guideline-aligned, stepwise algorithm (with emerging biomarkers) to enhance accuracy and reduce missed or delayed cases. Ultimately, continued refinement of a comprehensive, multimodal diagnostic strategy that can integrate with emerging molecular tools is necessary for overcoming the current limitations of individual approaches to celiac diagnosis.

Journal of Translational GastroenterologyVol. 3(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Celiac Disease Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.