Distributed Lower‐Crustal Flow Beneath the Central Xianshuihe–Xiaojiang Fault System: Reconciling Geodesy and Geology

Abstract We use recently compiled GNSS velocities across the Zemuhe‐Daliangshan fault zone, part of the central Xianshuihe‐Xiaojiang fault system, to reconcile a long‐standing mismatch between geodetic and geologic slip‐rate estimates. We show that conventional elastic dislocation models yield slip rates and locking depths that conflict with seismic and geologic constraints. In contrast, models incorporating a viscoelastic rheology for the lower crust yield geologically consistent slip rates, with the Zemuhe fault slipping 7 mm/yr and the Daliangshan fault slipping 2 mm/yr, and locking depths more consistent with microseismicity (17–20 km). In contrast with major strike‐slip faults worldwide, deformation in this immature system appears distributed over a broad lower‐crustal region. These findings indicate that interpreting interseismic deformation with purely elastic models in fault zones that lack a mature, localized shear zone at depth can lead to misleading results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl120975
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distributed Lower‐Crustal Flow Beneath the Central Xianshuihe–Xiaojiang Fault System: Reconciling Geodesy and Geology

E. O. Lindsey, X. Rui
Geophysical Research Letters
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Distributed Lower‐Crustal Flow Beneath the Central Xianshuihe–Xiaojiang Fault System: Reconciling Geodesy and Geology

E. O. Lindsey, X. Rui
article en

Abstract

Abstract We use recently compiled GNSS velocities across the Zemuhe‐Daliangshan fault zone, part of the central Xianshuihe‐Xiaojiang fault system, to reconcile a long‐standing mismatch between geodetic and geologic slip‐rate estimates. We show that conventional elastic dislocation models yield slip rates and locking depths that conflict with seismic and geologic constraints. In contrast, models incorporating a viscoelastic rheology for the lower crust yield geologically consistent slip rates, with the Zemuhe fault slipping 7 mm/yr and the Daliangshan fault slipping 2 mm/yr, and locking depths more consistent with microseismicity (17–20 km). In contrast with major strike‐slip faults worldwide, deformation in this immature system appears distributed over a broad lower‐crustal region. These findings indicate that interpreting interseismic deformation with purely elastic models in fault zones that lack a mature, localized shear zone at depth can lead to misleading results.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(5)
University of New Mexico (US), Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.