Education for Thinking in the Anthropocene: A Call to Ecosophize P4C Thinking Systems

Abstract Matthew Lipman's Philosophy for Children (P4C) has been hailed as a valuable pedagogical program for addressing the nuanced questions raised by the Anthropocene. As many have proposed, its emphasis on reason‐based thinking, community philosophical reflection, and inclusivity of diverse perspectives offers youth a chance to develop the thinking and dialogical skills necessary to address the environmental crisis we are facing. Despite the clear value of programs like P4C (or Philosophy with Children [PwC]), I argue that the current landscape of inquiry (i.e., the text and the community of philosophical inquiry) lacks an ecological dimension. That is, it is too abstract and detached from the non‐ideal, immanent conditions of inquiry to purposefully cultivate thinkers who can make ecosocial decisions under the material conditions of the Anthropocene. Considering this narrowness, I resituate P4C within the broader program I call “Ecosophy with Children”: a purposeful reterritorialization of P4C's thinking systems as a transversal community of philosophical inquiry that conceptualizes participants' subjectivities in relation to their mental, social, and environmental ecological contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Theory
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.70088
Primary Topic
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Education for Thinking in the Anthropocene: A Call to Ecosophize P4C Thinking Systems

Jonathan Wurtz
Educational Theory
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
article

Education for Thinking in the Anthropocene: A Call to Ecosophize P4C Thinking Systems

Jonathan Wurtz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Matthew Lipman's Philosophy for Children (P4C) has been hailed as a valuable pedagogical program for addressing the nuanced questions raised by the Anthropocene. As many have proposed, its emphasis on reason‐based thinking, community philosophical reflection, and inclusivity of diverse perspectives offers youth a chance to develop the thinking and dialogical skills necessary to address the environmental crisis we are facing. Despite the clear value of programs like P4C (or Philosophy with Children [PwC]), I argue that the current landscape of inquiry (i.e., the text and the community of philosophical inquiry) lacks an ecological dimension. That is, it is too abstract and detached from the non‐ideal, immanent conditions of inquiry to purposefully cultivate thinkers who can make ecosocial decisions under the material conditions of the Anthropocene. Considering this narrowness, I resituate P4C within the broader program I call “Ecosophy with Children”: a purposeful reterritorialization of P4C's thinking systems as a transversal community of philosophical inquiry that conceptualizes participants' subjectivities in relation to their mental, social, and environmental ecological contexts.

Educational Theory
St. Mary's University, Texas (US), St. Mary's University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.