A predictive model for rapid assessment of protective efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

An effective predictive model of protection would be very helpful to provide a timely and reliable evaluation of the vaccine induced protection against corresponding to rapidly emerging evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. By integrating the validated "neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy" and "modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" models, we developed a composite sieve analysis framework (the "neutralizing antibody-genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" model) to predict the protective efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine regimens, particularly for different heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination regimens. Data for the model building were extracted from 23 published studies. Leave-one-out method was used to validate the model. Model validation demonstrated that the composite framework achieved high predictive accuracy, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98) for the "neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy" submodel and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.49-0.99) for the "modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" submodel. Most prediction errors were within 5% and 10%, respectively. By applying this framework with neutralizing antibody data and SARS-CoV-2 variant sequencing data, we predicted the protective efficacy of different heterologous prime-boost regimens. The regimen of two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose aerosolized Ad5-nCoV was estimated to confer 95.40% (95% CI: 92.67-98.13%) protection against symptomatic infection with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 at day 28 post-boost, 79.56% (95% CI: 53.31-100.00%) against the Delta variant, and 68.21% (95% CI: 42.53-93.89%) against Omicron BA.5.2.20. Predicted efficacy against other Omicron sublineages was generally below 50%, with near-zero efficacy for KP.2, KP.3 and XDV.1. Compared with this regimen, two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose intramuscular Ad5-nCoV booster or three-dose CoronaVac yielded consistently lower predicted efficacy across all variants. This study offers a generalizable approach for rapidly evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines against emerging variants, providing timely evidence to guide vaccine deployment in future outbreaks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infectious Disease Modelling
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2026.03.003
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A predictive model for rapid assessment of protective efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

Chengwei Shao, Siyue Jia, Lairun Jin, Pengfei Jin et al.
Infectious Disease Modelling
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

A predictive model for rapid assessment of protective efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants

Chengwei Shao, Siyue Jia, Lairun Jin, Pengfei Jin, Ruifan Shen, Jingxin Li
article en

Abstract

An effective predictive model of protection would be very helpful to provide a timely and reliable evaluation of the vaccine induced protection against corresponding to rapidly emerging evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. By integrating the validated "neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy" and "modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" models, we developed a composite sieve analysis framework (the "neutralizing antibody-genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" model) to predict the protective efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine regimens, particularly for different heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination regimens. Data for the model building were extracted from 23 published studies. Leave-one-out method was used to validate the model. Model validation demonstrated that the composite framework achieved high predictive accuracy, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98) for the "neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy" submodel and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.49-0.99) for the "modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy" submodel. Most prediction errors were within 5% and 10%, respectively. By applying this framework with neutralizing antibody data and SARS-CoV-2 variant sequencing data, we predicted the protective efficacy of different heterologous prime-boost regimens. The regimen of two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose aerosolized Ad5-nCoV was estimated to confer 95.40% (95% CI: 92.67-98.13%) protection against symptomatic infection with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 at day 28 post-boost, 79.56% (95% CI: 53.31-100.00%) against the Delta variant, and 68.21% (95% CI: 42.53-93.89%) against Omicron BA.5.2.20. Predicted efficacy against other Omicron sublineages was generally below 50%, with near-zero efficacy for KP.2, KP.3 and XDV.1. Compared with this regimen, two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose intramuscular Ad5-nCoV booster or three-dose CoronaVac yielded consistently lower predicted efficacy across all variants. This study offers a generalizable approach for rapidly evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines against emerging variants, providing timely evidence to guide vaccine deployment in future outbreaks.

Infectious Disease ModellingVol. 11(3)
China Pharmaceutical University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Southeast University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.