Why Deep Brain Stimulation for Obesity Is Ethically Impermissible

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has increasingly been pursued as a treatment for obesity over the past couple of decades. This has occurred despite limited scientific justification or a serious ethical analysis of the concerns it raises. These interventions have relied on an "obese brain" model, which treats fatness as a neurological defect that can and should be corrected-reflecting and reinforcing stigmatizing, racialized assumptions about self-control, deviance, and bodily normalcy. To show this, we situate DBS for obesity within the broader and ethically troubling history of psychosurgery. We critique the scientific basis of the obese brain model and argue that its moral justification ultimately collapses. In this narrative framing, we argue that DBS for obesity is not a therapeutic innovation; instead it is a continuation of medicine's role in pathologizing nonconformity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJOB Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2026.2629384
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Deep Brain Stimulation for Obesity Is Ethically Impermissible

Kayla R. Mehl, Kailyn Price, Ian Stevens
AJOB Neuroscience
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Why Deep Brain Stimulation for Obesity Is Ethically Impermissible

Kayla R. Mehl, Kailyn Price, Ian Stevens
article en

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has increasingly been pursued as a treatment for obesity over the past couple of decades. This has occurred despite limited scientific justification or a serious ethical analysis of the concerns it raises. These interventions have relied on an "obese brain" model, which treats fatness as a neurological defect that can and should be corrected-reflecting and reinforcing stigmatizing, racialized assumptions about self-control, deviance, and bodily normalcy. To show this, we situate DBS for obesity within the broader and ethically troubling history of psychosurgery. We critique the scientific basis of the obese brain model and argue that its moral justification ultimately collapses. In this narrative framing, we argue that DBS for obesity is not a therapeutic innovation; instead it is a continuation of medicine's role in pathologizing nonconformity.

AJOB Neuroscience
Hastings Center (US), George Washington University (US), Center for Practical Bioethics (US), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.