Integrated Flue‐Gas Heat Recovery for Optimized Steam and Power Generation Using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Technical and Economic Assessment

ABSTRACT Optimized power‐generation flowsheets incorporating the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) were developed and simulated in Aspen HYSYS and Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for four energy‐recovery configurations. The study evaluates four cases: Case 1 involves steam production and power generation via Gas‐Turbine Generators and ORC systems. Case 2 shows similar performance. Case 3 achieves the highest power output, with a 10% increase, a thermal efficiency of 29.68%, and an exergy efficiency of 17.5%. Case 4 uses an optimized ORC package for simultaneous steam and power production, demonstrating the best technical and economic performance. Case 4 also delivers both electricity and steam at 7354 kg/h. The total project costs for Cases 1–4 are 1.02 × 10⁷, 6.64 × 10⁶, 1.14 × 10⁷, and 8.07 × 10⁶ USD, respectively, highlighting the technical and economic advantages of the proposed ORC configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70491
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Flue‐Gas Heat Recovery for Optimized Steam and Power Generation Using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Technical and Economic Assessment

Vahid Pirouzfar, Anashe Aghajani, Chia‐Hung Su
Energy Science & Engineering
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Integrated Flue‐Gas Heat Recovery for Optimized Steam and Power Generation Using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Technical and Economic Assessment

Vahid Pirouzfar, Anashe Aghajani, Chia‐Hung Su
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Optimized power‐generation flowsheets incorporating the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) were developed and simulated in Aspen HYSYS and Aspen Capital Cost Estimator for four energy‐recovery configurations. The study evaluates four cases: Case 1 involves steam production and power generation via Gas‐Turbine Generators and ORC systems. Case 2 shows similar performance. Case 3 achieves the highest power output, with a 10% increase, a thermal efficiency of 29.68%, and an exergy efficiency of 17.5%. Case 4 uses an optimized ORC package for simultaneous steam and power production, demonstrating the best technical and economic performance. Case 4 also delivers both electricity and steam at 7354 kg/h. The total project costs for Cases 1–4 are 1.02 × 10⁷, 6.64 × 10⁶, 1.14 × 10⁷, and 8.07 × 10⁶ USD, respectively, highlighting the technical and economic advantages of the proposed ORC configurations.

Energy Science & Engineering
Ming Chi University of Technology (TW), Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrated Flue‐Gas Heat Recovery for Optimized Steam and Power Generation Using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): A Technical and Economic Assessment — Vahid Pirouzfar, Anashe Aghajani, et al. · Energy Science & Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS