Political Signaling via Equity Ownership: Impacts on Supplier Financial Performance

ABSTRACT This study offers a new application of signaling theory to better understand the role of equity linkages and political influence on buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs). We examine the signaling effects of a politician's personal equity investment in a buyer firm on the financial performance of the supplier firms located in the politician's constituency, that is, “constituent suppliers.” Our results show that constituent suppliers' financial performance increases with the home politician ownership of their principal buyers, consistent with home politicians' incentives to benefit their constituencies and gain the support of local voters through promoting supplier–buyer relationships. Interestingly, such positive signaling effects on the financial performances of constituent suppliers vary with interdependence relationships between the home politician, investee buyer, and constituent supplier. The positive performance effect is stronger when investee buyers have greater political engagement, when politician owners hold more powerful congressional positions, and when the economic condition of the politician's constituency is poorer. In contrast, the positive performance effect is attenuated when buyers have higher economic dependence and switching costs vis‐à‐vis their suppliers. Our mechanism analyses reveal that the likelihood of increased sales as well as lowered operating and sales support costs partially mediate the relationship between supplier financial performance and home politician ownership in buyers, representing investee buyers' munificence. The investee buyers are also more likely to select firms located in their politician shareholders' constituencies as new suppliers, another mechanism of promoting business relationships with constituent firms. We further find that buyers with politician shareholders from their suppliers' constituencies receive more valuable government contract awards, and smaller firms exhibit significant performance gains. A series of endogeneity checks based on exogenous shocks and alternative measures highlight the robustness of our results. Our findings suggest that politicians' stock ownership in buyer firms signals secondary stakeholder influence and information sharing that shapes BSRs, promoting profitable business relationships for constituent suppliers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Operations Management
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.70036
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Signaling via Equity Ownership: Impacts on Supplier Financial Performance

Morgan Swink, Wenming Wang, In‐Mu Haw, Jun Chen
Journal of Operations Management
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Political Signaling via Equity Ownership: Impacts on Supplier Financial Performance

Morgan Swink, Wenming Wang, In‐Mu Haw, Jun Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study offers a new application of signaling theory to better understand the role of equity linkages and political influence on buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs). We examine the signaling effects of a politician's personal equity investment in a buyer firm on the financial performance of the supplier firms located in the politician's constituency, that is, “constituent suppliers.” Our results show that constituent suppliers' financial performance increases with the home politician ownership of their principal buyers, consistent with home politicians' incentives to benefit their constituencies and gain the support of local voters through promoting supplier–buyer relationships. Interestingly, such positive signaling effects on the financial performances of constituent suppliers vary with interdependence relationships between the home politician, investee buyer, and constituent supplier. The positive performance effect is stronger when investee buyers have greater political engagement, when politician owners hold more powerful congressional positions, and when the economic condition of the politician's constituency is poorer. In contrast, the positive performance effect is attenuated when buyers have higher economic dependence and switching costs vis‐à‐vis their suppliers. Our mechanism analyses reveal that the likelihood of increased sales as well as lowered operating and sales support costs partially mediate the relationship between supplier financial performance and home politician ownership in buyers, representing investee buyers' munificence. The investee buyers are also more likely to select firms located in their politician shareholders' constituencies as new suppliers, another mechanism of promoting business relationships with constituent firms. We further find that buyers with politician shareholders from their suppliers' constituencies receive more valuable government contract awards, and smaller firms exhibit significant performance gains. A series of endogeneity checks based on exogenous shocks and alternative measures highlight the robustness of our results. Our findings suggest that politicians' stock ownership in buyer firms signals secondary stakeholder influence and information sharing that shapes BSRs, promoting profitable business relationships for constituent suppliers.

Journal of Operations Management
Texas Christian University (US), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.