LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Models

Large language model (LLM) research has grown rapidly, along with increasing concern about their limitations. In this survey, we conduct a data-driven, semi-automated review of research on limitations of LLMs ( LLLMs ) from 2022 to early 2025 using a bottom-up approach. From a corpus of 250,000 ACL and arXiv papers, we identify 14,648 relevant papers using keyword filtering, LLM-based classification, validated against expert labels, and topic clustering (via two approaches, HDBSCAN+BERTopic and LlooM). We find that the share of LLM-related papers increases over fivefold in ACL and nearly eightfold in arXiv between 2022 and 2025. Since 2022, LLLMs research grows even faster, reaching over 30% of LLM papers by 2025. Reasoning remains the most studied limitation, followed by generalization , hallucination , bias , and security . The distribution of topics in the ACL dataset stays relatively stable over time, while arXiv shifts toward security risks , alignment , hallucinations , knowledge editing , and multimodality . We offer a quantitative view of trends in LLLMs research and release a dataset of annotated abstracts and a validated methodology, available at: github.com/a-kostikova/LLLMs-Survey.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3801096
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Models

Aida Kostikova, Benjamin Paaßen, Steffen Eger, Deidamea Bajri et al.
ACM Computing Surveys
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

LLLMs: A Data-Driven Survey of Evolving Research on Limitations of Large Language Models

Aida Kostikova, Benjamin Paaßen, Steffen Eger, Deidamea Bajri, Ole Pütz, Zhipin Wang
article en

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) research has grown rapidly, along with increasing concern about their limitations. In this survey, we conduct a data-driven, semi-automated review of research on limitations of LLMs ( LLLMs ) from 2022 to early 2025 using a bottom-up approach. From a corpus of 250,000 ACL and arXiv papers, we identify 14,648 relevant papers using keyword filtering, LLM-based classification, validated against expert labels, and topic clustering (via two approaches, HDBSCAN+BERTopic and LlooM). We find that the share of LLM-related papers increases over fivefold in ACL and nearly eightfold in arXiv between 2022 and 2025. Since 2022, LLLMs research grows even faster, reaching over 30% of LLM papers by 2025. Reasoning remains the most studied limitation, followed by generalization , hallucination , bias , and security . The distribution of topics in the ACL dataset stays relatively stable over time, while arXiv shifts toward security risks , alignment , hallucinations , knowledge editing , and multimodality . We offer a quantitative view of trends in LLLMs research and release a dataset of annotated abstracts and a validated methodology, available at: github.com/a-kostikova/LLLMs-Survey.

ACM Computing Surveys
University of Mannheim (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), University of Technology Nuremberg
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.