Feedback practices with teacher dashboards in primary education: Exploring dashboard-prompted feedback across lesson phases

In primary education, adaptive learning technologies (ALTs) personalise tasks and provide teacher dashboards that visualise real-time student performance and progress. These dashboards can help teachers to provide targeted, real-time feedback based on the dashboard data, a practice known as dashboard-prompted feedback (DP-feedback). This study examined how teachers give different types of DP-feedback (task, process, metacognitive, social, and personal) across different lesson phases (e.g., instruction, guided practice, independent practice). We observed 25 teachers giving dashboard-supported mathematics lessons in primary education. Using visualised behavioural clustering, we analysed the distribution of teachers' DP-feedback across lesson phases. Our results showed that DP-feedback mainly consisted of task and process feedback and was mostly provided in the later phases of the lessons. Three clusters of DP-feedback were identified: feedback provided in one, two, or three lesson phases. No significant relationship was found between the type of feedback and the number of lesson phases in which DP-feedback was given. In addition, we explored the relationship between the clusters and teacher characteristics. Overall, teachers’ dashboard use differed primarily in when DP-feedback was enacted across lesson phases, rather than in which feedback types were used, highlighting the relevance of phase-sensitive support and technology-specific experience. • Teacher dashboards visualise real-time student data and can enhance teachers’ feedback practices. • This study examined when (lesson phase) and what type of dashboard-prompted (DP) feedback primary teachers provide in ALT-supported mathematics lessons. • DP-feedback occurred mainly during independent practice, extended instruction, closure, and evaluation. • DP-feedback given by teachers is mainly focused on the task and the process of the task that students are making during the lesson. • Discovered clusters of DP-feedback among teachers: feedback provided in one, two, or three lesson phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Education
Published
2026-03-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105615
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feedback practices with teacher dashboards in primary education: Exploring dashboard-prompted feedback across lesson phases

Inge Molenaar, Mario de Jonge, Nadira Saab, Manel van Kessel et al.
Computers & Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Feedback practices with teacher dashboards in primary education: Exploring dashboard-prompted feedback across lesson phases

Inge Molenaar, Mario de Jonge, Nadira Saab, Manel van Kessel, C.A.N. Knoop-van Campen
article en

Abstract

In primary education, adaptive learning technologies (ALTs) personalise tasks and provide teacher dashboards that visualise real-time student performance and progress. These dashboards can help teachers to provide targeted, real-time feedback based on the dashboard data, a practice known as dashboard-prompted feedback (DP-feedback). This study examined how teachers give different types of DP-feedback (task, process, metacognitive, social, and personal) across different lesson phases (e.g., instruction, guided practice, independent practice). We observed 25 teachers giving dashboard-supported mathematics lessons in primary education. Using visualised behavioural clustering, we analysed the distribution of teachers' DP-feedback across lesson phases. Our results showed that DP-feedback mainly consisted of task and process feedback and was mostly provided in the later phases of the lessons. Three clusters of DP-feedback were identified: feedback provided in one, two, or three lesson phases. No significant relationship was found between the type of feedback and the number of lesson phases in which DP-feedback was given. In addition, we explored the relationship between the clusters and teacher characteristics. Overall, teachers’ dashboard use differed primarily in when DP-feedback was enacted across lesson phases, rather than in which feedback types were used, highlighting the relevance of phase-sensitive support and technology-specific experience. • Teacher dashboards visualise real-time student data and can enhance teachers’ feedback practices. • This study examined when (lesson phase) and what type of dashboard-prompted (DP) feedback primary teachers provide in ALT-supported mathematics lessons. • DP-feedback occurred mainly during independent practice, extended instruction, closure, and evaluation. • DP-feedback given by teachers is mainly focused on the task and the process of the task that students are making during the lesson. • Discovered clusters of DP-feedback among teachers: feedback provided in one, two, or three lesson phases.

Computers & EducationVol. 249
Leiden University (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.