Mapping the <scp>US</scp> Bridgebuilding Field: Situating Organizations in the Ecosystem of Social Change

ABSTRACT This article explores the ecosystem of bridge‐building initiatives in the United States. Drawing on an original database of 223 organizations, interviews with 7 staff across 6 organizations, and a literature review related to bridge‐building, polarization, and collective action, we first describe the range of existing initiatives and their areas of focus. We then explore the work of these organizations in terms of their contributions to scaling the bridge‐building field as well as the focus of many on community‐level issues and collaboration, which enables a shift from talk to action and contributions to social change. Our findings provide empirical support for the concept of “massively parallel peacebuilding” (Burgess and Burgess; Burgess et al.); they also illustrate alignment between bridge‐building and systemic change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.70033
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the US Bridgebuilding Field: Situating Organizations in the Ecosystem of Social Change

Karen Ross, Gabrielle Mathews
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Mapping the US Bridgebuilding Field: Situating Organizations in the Ecosystem of Social Change

Karen Ross, Gabrielle Mathews
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores the ecosystem of bridge‐building initiatives in the United States. Drawing on an original database of 223 organizations, interviews with 7 staff across 6 organizations, and a literature review related to bridge‐building, polarization, and collective action, we first describe the range of existing initiatives and their areas of focus. We then explore the work of these organizations in terms of their contributions to scaling the bridge‐building field as well as the focus of many on community‐level issues and collaboration, which enables a shift from talk to action and contributions to social change. Our findings provide empirical support for the concept of “massively parallel peacebuilding” (Burgess and Burgess; Burgess et al.); they also illustrate alignment between bridge‐building and systemic change.

Conflict Resolution Quarterly
University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.