Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Endoscopy, Histology, and Radiology Applications

ABSTRACT Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases remain among the leading causes of global mortality, with early detection directly linked to survival outcomes. While previous reviews have focused on single imaging modalities, this systematic review uniquely examines artificial intelligence applications across endoscopic, radiological, and histological approaches, reflecting actual clinical diagnostic pathways. This systematic review analyzes 76 high‐quality studies (2016–2024) and provides the first comprehensive assessment of how AI performs across different imaging techniques for GI abnormality detection. This multi‐modal perspective is particularly timely as healthcare systems move toward integrated diagnostic workflows. Our analysis reveals endoscopy as the most widely used modality ( n = 44), particularly for Helicobacter pylori , colorectal polyps, and ulcerative colitis detection. Histological analysis emerges as the second most common approach ( n = 25), especially for celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, while CT imaging ( n = 10) primarily supports colorectal polyp detection. Deep learning methods significantly outnumber traditional machine learning techniques (68 vs. 8 studies), consistently achieving 90%–99% diagnostic accuracy across multiple disease categories. However, these systems face significant implementation barriers to clinical adoption. Most validation is still conducted in controlled, single‐center settings using curated datasets that poorly reflect clinical complexity. Future studies must prioritize multicenter validation, standardized imaging protocols and preprocessing pipelines, and the integration of interpretable AI models capable of providing transparent diagnostic rationale. This review maps the current technical landscape while highlighting critical translational challenges that must be addressed to enable real‐world impact. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Data Preprocessing Technologies > Artificial Intelligence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.70074
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Endoscopy, Histology, and Radiology Applications

Massimo Salvi, J. Lewis, Alen Shahini, Tanweer Ali et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of Endoscopy, Histology, and Radiology Applications

Massimo Salvi, J. Lewis, Alen Shahini, Tanweer Ali, Sameena Pathan, U. Rajendra Acharya, Filippo Molinari
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases remain among the leading causes of global mortality, with early detection directly linked to survival outcomes. While previous reviews have focused on single imaging modalities, this systematic review uniquely examines artificial intelligence applications across endoscopic, radiological, and histological approaches, reflecting actual clinical diagnostic pathways. This systematic review analyzes 76 high‐quality studies (2016–2024) and provides the first comprehensive assessment of how AI performs across different imaging techniques for GI abnormality detection. This multi‐modal perspective is particularly timely as healthcare systems move toward integrated diagnostic workflows. Our analysis reveals endoscopy as the most widely used modality ( n = 44), particularly for Helicobacter pylori , colorectal polyps, and ulcerative colitis detection. Histological analysis emerges as the second most common approach ( n = 25), especially for celiac disease and ulcerative colitis, while CT imaging ( n = 10) primarily supports colorectal polyp detection. Deep learning methods significantly outnumber traditional machine learning techniques (68 vs. 8 studies), consistently achieving 90%–99% diagnostic accuracy across multiple disease categories. However, these systems face significant implementation barriers to clinical adoption. Most validation is still conducted in controlled, single‐center settings using curated datasets that poorly reflect clinical complexity. Future studies must prioritize multicenter validation, standardized imaging protocols and preprocessing pipelines, and the integration of interpretable AI models capable of providing transparent diagnostic rationale. This review maps the current technical landscape while highlighting critical translational challenges that must be addressed to enable real‐world impact. This article is categorized under: Technologies > Data Preprocessing Technologies > Artificial Intelligence

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoveryVol. 16(1)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Politecnico di Torino (IT), University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.