Subnational Border Reforms and Economic Activity in Africa

ABSTRACT Using GIS methods, we identify territories in Africa affected by subnational border reforms between 1992 and 2013. Descriptive statistics reveal that these territories differed from other African regions across several key dimensions. For example, these territories were more populous and exhibited greater ethnic diversity. We then examine the association between subnational border reforms and economic activity across 17 African countries. Grid‐level estimations indicate a positive association between border reforms and local economic activity. However, allowing for country‐level heterogeneity reveals that border reforms are negatively associated with local economic activity in six countries. Excluding Ethiopia from the sample substantially reduces the magnitude of the overall positive estimate. A systematic examination of heterogeneity reveals that border reforms implemented for administrative purposes are positively associated with economic activity, while those driven by ethnic politics have no effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70052
Primary Topic
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subnational Border Reforms and Economic Activity in Africa

Sebastian Blesse
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
article

Subnational Border Reforms and Economic Activity in Africa

Sebastian Blesse
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using GIS methods, we identify territories in Africa affected by subnational border reforms between 1992 and 2013. Descriptive statistics reveal that these territories differed from other African regions across several key dimensions. For example, these territories were more populous and exhibited greater ethnic diversity. We then examine the association between subnational border reforms and economic activity across 17 African countries. Grid‐level estimations indicate a positive association between border reforms and local economic activity. However, allowing for country‐level heterogeneity reveals that border reforms are negatively associated with local economic activity in six countries. Excluding Ethiopia from the sample substantially reduces the magnitude of the overall positive estimate. A systematic examination of heterogeneity reveals that border reforms implemented for administrative purposes are positively associated with economic activity, while those driven by ethnic politics have no effect.

Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Ifo Institute for Economic Research (DE), Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), Centre for European Economic Research (DE), University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.